Today Sony announces the successor to last year’s Xperia 1 flagship phone, the new Xperia 1 II, as well as teasing a new interesting device in the form of the Xperia PRO, aimed at professional photographers.

The Xperia 1 was the first Sony flagship device that followed the company’s mobile division reshuffle under the head of Kimio Maki, former head of Sony’s Alpha mirrorless camera success. The new Xperia 1 II further embraces this new merging of product lines within Sony as we’re seeing new synergies between features that made the Alpha line-up of devices popular.

The Xperia 1 II also upgrades its hardware to be on par with what you’d expect in 2020: Powered by a new Snapdragon 865 SoC, brand-new camera sensors, as well as a seemingly 90Hz screen, all while packing a bigger battery, the new device on paper looks to be an upgrade in the right places, all while retaining the signature characteristics that made the Xperia 1 a differentiating device in 2019. There are also some surprises in the mix, some good, and some possibly bad. We see the return of the 3.5mm headphone jack, but an odd lack of 5G in the US variants of the phone. We’re be going over the specifications in more detail:

Sony Xperia 1 Series
 

Sony Xperia 1 II

Sony Xperia 1
SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 

1x Cortex-A77 @ 2.84GHz
3x Cortex-A77 @ 2.42GHz
4x Cortex-A55 @ 1.80GHz

Adreno 650 @ 587MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 

1x K485 (Cortex-A76) @ 2.84GHz
3x K485 (Cortex-A76) @ 2.42GHz
4x K485 (Cortex-A55) @ 1.80GHz

Adreno 640 @ 585MHz
DRAM 8GB 6GB LPDDR4X
Display 6.5" AMOLED
3840 x 1644 (21:9)

90Hz (Interpolated?)
6.5" AMOLED
3840 x 1644 (21:9)

 
Size Height 166 mm 167 mm
Width 72 mm 72 mm
Depth 7.9 mm 8.2 mm
Weight 181 grams 178 grams
Battery Capacity 4000mAh

18W USB-PD Adaptive Charging
3330mAh

18W USB-PD Adaptive Charging
Wireless Charging Yes -
Rear Cameras
Main 12MP 1.8µm Dual Pixel PDAF
1/1.7" sensor

24mm / 
f/1.7 with OIS
12MP 1.4µm Dual Pixel PDAF
1/2.6" sensor

26mm / 78°
f/1.6 with OIS
Telephoto 12MP 1.0µm PDAF
1/3.4" sensor

70mm /  / 3x zoom
f/2.4 with OIS
12MP 1.0µm PDAF
1/3.4" sensor

52mm / 45° / 2x zoom
f/2.4 with OIS
Wide 12MP 1.4µm Dual Pixel PDAF
1/2.6" sensor

16mm / 130°
f/2.2
12MP 1.0µm PDAF
1/3.4" sensor

16mm / 130°
f/2.4 fixed focus
Extra 3D Time-of-Flight (ToF) -
Front Camera 8MP 1.12µm
f/2.0
8MP 1.12µm
f/2.0
Storage 256GB 128GB UFS 2.1
I/O USB-C
3.5mm headphone jack
USB-C
no 3.5mm headphone jack
Cellular 4G (US)

5G (Depending on market)
4G
Wireless (local) TBC 802.11ac Wave 2 Wi-Fi
Bluetooth 5.0 LE + NFC
IP Rating IP65 & IP68
Other Features Dual Speakers
Dual-SIM 1x nanoSIM + microSD 
or
2x nanoSIM
Launch Price $1099 / £ / 1199€ $949 / £849 / €949

Starting off with the hardware, as expected we see the use of a new Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SoC which puts the Xperia 1 II at the same level as other 2020 flagship devices. Sony has raised the RAM and storage configuration of the X1II, bumping it up to 8GB and 256GB by default (with no other options); the storage increase is particularly welcome.

Amongst the internal hardware improvements is a much bigger battery capacity, alleviating one of the Xperia 1’s largest weaknesses, upgrading from a 3330mAh unit to a 4000mAh new design, a 20% generational uplift.

The increased battery capacity didn’t have any large impact on the form-factor of the phone, as the new unit is only 3g heavier at 181g, and Sony even managed to reduce the thickness by 0.3mm down to 7.9mm. The width of the phone remains the same at a 72mm which is a sweet-spot in terms of ergonomics and usability, and Sony even shaved off 1mm in length down to 166mm. Sony even managed to add in wireless charging without any impact to the dimensions of the phone, also addressing the previous generation’s lacking thereof.

Characteristic Design, 90Hz Screen*, But Still 4K Resolution

In terms of design, the phone unmistakably follows its predecessor, characterised by the squared off corners of the 21:9 aspect ratio screen. The display panel unfortunately remains a 4K resolution panel – we deemed this feature to be a massive waste of battery life with little to no real-world benefits in terms of viewing experience. I hope Sony here at least is using a newer generation panel that’s able to increase the power efficiency of the display.

A new feature to the new screen though is what Sony calls “Motion Blur Reduction” feature that it advertises as equivalent to 90Hz displays. What I think this is a 90Hz panel which interpolates 60Hz rendering to create smoother content, which would be an interesting take on the high-refresh rate feature that we’ve seen being popularised over the last year by various vendors.

Sony has slightly changed the bezel / frame design of the new Xperia 1 II, which is now features a chamfer design and flat side-frame compared to the round frame of the Xperia 1 – we’ll have to see how this change affects the ergonomics of the phone.

The phone still has a dual-speaker setup two front-firing speakers with better immersive audio quality.

3.5mm Headphone Jack Resurrection

The most surprising feature change of the Xperia 1 II is the re-introduction of the 3.5mm headphone jack. Sony has said it’s seen bad feedback and a backlash from users on the Xperia 1 due to its headphone jack removal, and frankly, it’s was very much deserved. Sony is not only backtracking on the removal of the headphone jack, but it’s claiming to have improved the quality of the new 3.5mm output. Sony advertises its 360 Reality Audio processing engine being implemented in hardware, and I have to wonder if this means that the DAC of the phone is Sony’s own QN1 chipset (or similar), the same hardware that powered Sony’s popular WH-1000XM3 headphones.

Whatever the hardware may be, the fact that Sony is bringing back the headphone jack is a huge story in itself as it just proves how stupid the industry trend of removing the 3.5mm connector has been. Props to Sony for bringing it back – I hope other vendors follow suit.

New Camera Hardware – But Still Confused About What’s a Smartphone Camera?

The Xperia 1 II majorly upgrades its camera hardware. Starting off with the main unit, Sony has upgraded its sensor from a 1/2.6” unit to a much larger 1/1.7” sensor, this results in a pixel pitch upgrade from 1.4µm to 1.8µm, resulting in a 65% increase in light capture ability. The resolution has remained static at 12MP but I’m not too worried about that as what matters is the effective spatial resolution the sensor and optics can capture. The optics are now slightly wider at 24mm equivalent instead of 26mm equivalent on the Xperia 1, and the aperture is now at f/1.7 and OIS is maintained on the sensor.

The telephoto module seemingly hasn’t changed the sensor, which remains at 12MP with 1.0µm pixels, but sees a change in the optics which are now at 70mm equivalent, or 3x optical zoom compared to the main camera, a longer focal length than the 52 / 2x zoom equivalent on the Xperia 1. I do think this is a nice change as I find it such a focal length more useful. OIS is of course also integrated in the f/2.2 optics.

Finally, the ultra-wide-angle module remains the same in its field-of-view, but sees a huge upgrade in the sensor as it’s upgraded from a 1/3.4” sensor to an 1/2.6” unit, meaning pixel pitches have increased from 1µm to 1.4µm, all while retaining the 12MP resolution. The sensor is also PD-PDAF which is interesting, we haven’t had confirmation yet if this means the module now has variable focus – a feature that was lacking in the fixed focus optics of the Xperia 1 UWA module.

Sony discloses that they've partnered with Zeiss to be able to bring to market the optics of the new Xperia 1 II. If this is an improvement remains to be seen; the Xperia 1's optics sharpness was amongst one of the best on the market, and actually its one major strengths, with only the barrel distortion of the UWA being something to complain about, maybe Sony opted to go more rectilinear this generation?

Sony put a lot of emphasis on the autofocus capabilities of the new camera. The sensor is a dual-pixel PDAF unit and claims it covers 70% of the sensor, which is a bit odd as I thought PD-PDAF units had 100% sensor coverage. Sony also employs some of its AF knowledge from the Alpha 9 line-up to achieve 60fps autofocus and autoexposure calculations, and the phone is able to capture burst photos at 20 frames/second. It also includes the Alpha’s known eye-AF algorithms for humans and animals.

Sony integrates a new “Photo Pro” interface that aligns with what we’ve seen from the Alpha camera UIs.

Honestly, I feel that while all these feature additions are great, Sony’s largest problem historically is that they’ve been very bad at smartphone photography. Autofocus accuracy and speed matters very little in a smartphone if the image processing just isn’t up to standards, and the Xperia 1 last year showcased amongst the worst results of any phone we’ve tested in 2019. So, while the new Xperia 1 II looks good on paper, we’ll have to wait and see how the cameras perform in the real-world.

Launching in Spring – With No 5G in the US?

Arguably there’s no bad products, only bad prices, and the fact that the Xperia 1 II is launching in the US at $1099 without featuring any 5G connectivity is quite disappointing, and the company is off to a bad start versus the competition.

Update: We originally were briefed on the above pricing, but Sony has communicated that US availability and pricing are subject to changes, so the pricing might not be representative of the actual commercial launch price.

In Europe, the Xperia 1 II launches with 5G sub-6GHz at a staggering 1199€.

I’m not sure exactly what Sony did here in terms of hardware design, Qualcomm had confirmed the Snapdragon 865 is paired with the 5G capable X55 modem, so for a device to lack 5G means that Sony must have omitted the 5G RF in the design. I understand if it might have lacked mmWave, but also lacking sub-6GHz means it won’t be a future-proof device. Sony did say it will have 5G variants for other markets, but we don’t have further information on the matter at the time of writing.

Xperia PRO - a mmWave 5G Professional Photographer Oriented Phone That Makes Sense?

Alongside the Xperia 1 II, Sony also announced, or better say, pre-announced another new smartphone. The new Xperia Pro represents a new type of device that is targeted at professional photographers.

Hardware wise, the Xperia Pro shares almost all the specifications of the Xperia 1 II, with the difference of 512GB storage as default as well as the inclusion of 5G sub-6Ghz and mmWave connectivity.

Design wise, it’s a bit of a departure as it instead of the glass back and sleek metal frame it comes in a much more rugged casing that you’d expect from professional grade gear.

I said that the Xperia Pro makes a lot of sense, and the sole reason for that being is that the phone features an HDMI input port alongside its USB-C port. This is extremely unique in a smartphone and what this enables, is for photographers to connect their camera gear to the phone, and have the phone’s high-quality screen be used as a monitor.

Sony didn’t go into more details into the exact capabilities of the Xperia Pro’s HDMI input, but using the phone as a screen is merely just the starting point of what such a setup can bring – if the phone is able to record video off the camera source, this effectively then acts as an external video recorder, a piece of hardware that typically goes into the hundreds of dollars anyhow. Furthermore, if one can live-stream video content off your large professional camera and use the Xperia Pro as essentially a tethering device, it again opens up a lot of possibilities, and I think this is exactly Sony’s angle here with the 5G connectivity of the phone.

It’s a very interesting synergy for professional photographers who very well might justify whatever crazy price the Xperia Pro might end up at. For now, we’ll have to wait on Sony to divulge further information as the device isn’t due to launch till later in the year.

POST A COMMENT

119 Comments

View All Comments

  • name99 - Monday, February 24, 2020 - link

    It really makes you wonder. How lazy does someone in Marketing have to be (and how lazy does every single person around them have to be) to say "Oh, new model, what do we call it? OK, let's just add a 2 at the end. But in Roman numerals because, you know, classy".

    We're living in a time when it's considered unacceptable to hire angry people, the time of the "no-asshole" rule. But perhaps every single person in that organization NEEDS SOME ANGER sent their way.

    Not to go all Apple about this, but you think anyone in Apple marketing would have come to Steve Jobs with a suggestion like this? And would have continued to work in Apple marketing?
    And yeah, yeah, I am well aware of (and not impressed by) iPhone Pro Max. Or AirPods Pro which is again just lazy. Jobs would have demanded something like AirQuiet, not the clumsiness of AirPod's and the irrelevance of Pro.

    Tim's tried to allow more kindness at Apple and mostly the result seems to be the same as at Sony -- lazy sloppy people submitting lazy sloppy work in almost every department, from Marketing outward...

    Just think of that the next time someone at your company starts to complain that certain people are too demanding, that they require excellence and who has time for that.
    Reply
  • BenSkywalker - Tuesday, February 25, 2020 - link

    iMac? iPod? iPad?

    Really dumb names peaked under Jobs.
    Reply
  • s.yu - Tuesday, February 25, 2020 - link

    ...is it because you weren't hired because of your anger? Reply
  • name99 - Tuesday, February 25, 2020 - link

    Joke's on you. I worked at Apple for 10 years :-) Reply
  • Sp12er - Monday, February 24, 2020 - link

    Is it just me that think Mk/ "Mark" designation to be easy to understand? Sony used it in their cameras and headphones already, tehy simply used it on their smartphone now.

    Also, Sony already used up "Xperia_" numbers for other size and specs, its unlikely for sony to change it anytime soon.
    Reply
  • treign - Monday, February 24, 2020 - link

    My first cell phone was a Sony Z Ultra, big phone and i loved it. I was 33 at the time. I kept upgrading my phones to sony ones, but last year i decided to switch to LGG8. I hated it, and i mean i hated it so much i smashed it against my knee and started using my Sisters S8, and to be honest i hate that thing as well. My next upgrade will be back to sony. I don't understand the love the Samsung phones get, to me they feel cheap, I agree that phones don't need these High resolutions, it is a battery drain forsure. There is no need. I also hate phones are using the 21:9 ratios, i hate it. And i hate phones are removing the headphone jacks. It is the reason i went to LG actually. Sony to me, means quality and when you look at all the products they have made over the years you cannot deny it don't. Sony Xperia phones are way underrated. Can't wait to get to my next upgrade to go back to them. Reply
  • MobiusPizza - Monday, February 24, 2020 - link

    Anecdotal but I hated my Xperia Z2 phone. It was unreliable, hot and filmsy. My phone overheated so much I thought it will start to explode. The screen also cracked very easily despite screen protectors I replaced it twice. I went to Samsung S8 and that was slightly more longer lasting but the touch screen failed. I had no issue with my Huawei Mate 20 Pro to this day. Reply
  • Sharma_Ji - Monday, February 24, 2020 - link

    True, Samsungs have a majority of screen failure issue from a slight drop only, never saw this much on other OEM's. Reply
  • s.yu - Monday, February 24, 2020 - link

    S8 only, not before, not after, a single series. My S6 and Note8 both took multiple drops and the glass on both sides are still fine. Reply
  • khanikun - Tuesday, February 25, 2020 - link

    I had a Xperia Z2 and it's the phone that kept me buying Sony phones. I owned the original Galaxy S, Dell Streak 5, LG G2x, and then the Xperia Z2.

    The LG wasn't bad and worked well, just didn't like the design. The other 2 easily broke or just had crap that never worked on them. Galaxy S gps never worked from day 1.

    The Z2 works well, never broke, but the camera was horrendous. I eventually moved to a X, which I thought was a flagship phone, which it wasn't. Didn't research it, since it was a free phone, but got off it quickly and moved to a Z5. Currently on an XZ1.

    Zero problems with any of the phones, except the Z2 like 2 years after I replaced it. Was going to use it as an alarm clock and with it being shuffled around in drawers full of crap, the screen digitizer went. Turns on, just can't make touch inputs on the screen.

    I was going to move to a different phone manufacturer for my next phone, cause I thought Sony was going to stick with the horrible looking XZ2, with it's weird round back. Then the 1 came out and was so glad they went back to the flat back.

    The only thing I wish they'd do is increase the thickness, so they can get rid of the camera hump.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now