Following up on last week's Best Budget PC Guide, today we have midrange systems with roughly twice the cost. Of all the systems types to configure, the midrange market can be the most difficult. With budget systems you're often limited in what you can do by price constraints while at the high end the best components are usually pretty clear cut choices; for midrange builds there are many factors to consider. One of the core questions you always need to answer is: what do you want to do with the system? Office PCs will often have a different goal than something for a student, and there are many ways to adapt a particular system to fit the needs of the user. We have two configurations again, one AMD and one Intel, with optional graphics cards for those who want a system capable of handling the latest games. Let's start with AMD:

Midrange AMD System
Component Description Price
CPU AMD A10-7850K (4x3.7-4.0GHz, 4MB, 95W, 28nm) $170
Motherboard MSI A88X-G43 $78
RAM Team Vulcan 2x4GB DDR3-2133 CL10 1.65V $78
Storage Seagate Barracuda ST2000DM001 2TB $84
SSD Crucial MX100 256GB $109
Case Fractal Design Core 3300 $63
Power Supply Rosewill Capstone 450W 80 Plus Gold $60
Subtotal   $642
GPU (Optional) Sapphire Radeon R9 270X 2GB $190
GPU (Alternative) Zotac GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB $138
Total with GPU   $832

Right from the first component choice – the APU – we have plenty of things to consider. I've tailored the above build more towards performance than price or power, so the A10-7850K is really the only APU that makes sense. (You can make an argument for an AM3+ CPU like the FX-6300 or FX8320, but considering that platform has been around a while and is basically fading away I'm hesitant to recommend that route.) Besides the quad-core (dual-module) CPU portion of the APU, the 7850K has the full 512 core (eight Compute Unit) GPU. The A10-7800 is an option to consider at its $155 MSRP, but the only place I can find with the part in stock charges $166; for $4 more you might as well just go whole hog and get the 7850K. Dropping down to an A10-7700K will lose two of the GPU CUs and 200MHz off the CPU for $15, so it's also worth a thought, but if you don't need faster GPU performance you might as well go for the A8-7600 for $110 at that point.

For the rest of the system, the MSI motherboard has AMD's latest A88X chipset, we've selected DDR3-2133 RAM to provide increased bandwidth for the APU graphics, and the case is Fractal Design's latest Core 3300 (though you can use the case in the Intel build as an alternative). For storage, we've again included both an SSD for the OS and apps with a rather large 2TB HDD for mass storage; you could easily drop the HDD if you don't need that much storage, but for any modern system I simply refuse to leave out an SSD. The Crucial MX100 isn't the fastest SSD on the planet, but the price makes it incredibly attractive. Finally, the power supply may be overkill for the base build, but having some power to spare means adding a graphics card is always an option.

Speaking of graphics cards, while the APU graphics will do fine for most tasks and even light gaming, if you want to be able to play most games at 1080p with medium or higher detail settings, a dedicated graphics card is required. Here we've listed two options: NVIDIA's GTX 750 Ti (Maxwell) card and AMD's R9 270X card. The AMD card is faster and costs more, and it also uses a lot more power; if you want 1080p with high quality settings in most games, that's the card to get (and it's reflected in the price of the system with the GPU). NVIDIA's GTX 750 Ti on the other hand uses less than 75W and doesn't even require a PCI-E power adapter, and it can still run most games at medium to high settings and 1080p. Either GPU is certainly worth considering, at least if you want to play games – and if you don't, just get the core system and you can always add a GPU at some future date.

Midrange Intel System
Component Description Price
CPU Core i5-4590 (4x3.3-3.7GHz, 6MB, 84W, 22nm) $200
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Anniversary $90
RAM ADATA 2x4GB DDR3-1866 CL10 1.5V $77
Storage Seagate Barracuda ST2000DM001 2TB $84
SSD Crucial MX100 256GB $109
Case Antec Three Hundred Two $64
Power Supply Rosewill Capstone 450W 80 Plus Gold $60
Subtotal   $684
GPU (Optional) Sapphire Radeon R9 270X 2GB $190
GPU (Alternative) Zotac GeForce GTX 750 Ti 2GB $138
Total with GPU   $874

The Intel system this round ends up costing about $50 more than the AMD setup, thanks to a more expensive CPU and motherboard. There are ways to keep the prices closer, but overall the i5-4590 strikes a good balance of price and performance. It's about $25 less than the slightly faster i5-4690 but only around 3-5% slower, and unless you plan on overclocking it should offer everything you need. As we discussed in our recent CPU State of the Part, looking at overall system performance Intel's processors make a lot of sense for those that want a faster system.

The motherboard this time comes from ASRock and features Intel's latest Z97 chipset, and for the RAM we elected to go with a 1.5V kit of DDR3-1866 memory. While faster memory can help with the processor graphics on AMD's APUs, for Intel's CPUs the HD 4600 is usually limited by other factors than bandwidth. The same caveats about the storage components apply here as well, but if you're looking for alternatives the Samsung EVO 840 250GB is generally slightly faster than the Crucial MX100 while costing about $20 more.

The case for our Intel setup is an Antec Three Hundred Two, which is another popular option. Optional graphics choices can add a boost to gaming performance if you need it, but again a faster GPU could easily be added later on. If you're sure you won't want to add a dedicated GPU later, you can also save money on the PSU by going with the 300W Seasonic we used in our budget PC guide.

On either system, it's of course possible to go for a smaller micro-ATX case and motherboard. The prices are typically comparable and these days the only thing you're really sacrificing are expansion options, but considering many people don't run anything more than a hard drive and SSD along with a GPU, you really don't miss much. For mATX cases, you might like the Rosewill Line-M or Silverstone SST-PS07B. As far as mATX motherboards, the ASRock Z97M Pro4 would work well for the Intel platform, or for AMD the Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3H will even save you a few bucks compared to the MSI board we listed above.

As before, we've elected to leave out the OS, keyboard, mouse, and display; these are all commodity items and most people have existing accessories they can carry over from an old PC. You can always use a free OS like Ubuntu or some other flavor of Linux, whereas Windows will generally add $100 to the total. As far as displays go, I'm a sucker for larger displays and I've been using 30" LCDs for most of the past decade – one of the best investments I've ever made in terms of computer hardware! For a good midrange display, I'd give serious consideration to the 27" 2560x1440 panels that start at around $300; if you don't want something that large (or expensive), there are also plenty of 23-24" IPS/VA displays for around $150.

Finally, let's quickly talk about pre-built systems and why I don't generally recommend them. Really, it comes down to one thing: the refusal of the big OEMs and system builders to deliver a competitively priced desktop that includes at least a good quality 250/256GB SSD (or even a 128GB SSD). $500 will get you a Core i5 or AMD A10 processor, 4-8GB RAM, 1TB HDD, and whatever case and power supply the OEM uses. Generally speaking, you get fewer features, lower quality parts, and a less attractive design – but you do get a valid Windows license along with a low-end keyboard and mouse.

We could easily take the above systems and remove the SSD and drop down to a 1TB HDD to save $140. Using lower quality motherboards can shave off another $30-$50. Wrap things up by using a cheaper case and power supply (another $50 saved) and guess what you have: a less desirable system for one, with a base price of $450 or so. Buy a Windows license and you basically have the equivalent of a pre-built system.

It's not that OEM systems are necessarily terrible, but it's the age old story: you get what you pay for. I for one would much rather have a decent SSD, motherboard, case, and power supply. You can pay a system integrator to put something together as well, but even then your choice of parts is often limited and the prices are typically higher than if you DIY.

POST A COMMENT

65 Comments

View All Comments

  • SantaAna12 - Saturday, August 9, 2014 - link

    It's been said...but I thought I would throw this in the hat:

    Anandtech is better than this.

    I stopped cruising THW years ago after it sold because of commercial crap like this.

    Anandtech is better than this!
    Reply
  • JarredWalton - Saturday, August 9, 2014 - link

    Sorry you feel that way, but your comment offers no indication of the problem(s) you have with the article. "Commercial crap" like a PC guide recommendation, like we've been doing occasionally for decades? Okay then.... Reply
  • garadante - Saturday, August 9, 2014 - link

    At $60 there are plenty of higher wattage PSUs from reputable brands (such as Corsair), they just don't have a gold rating. But a gold rating is unnecessary unless you're going for a silent build (as little heat generated as possible) or are using such high wattage components that the reduction in power is actually noticeable. Getting a 600-750 watt PSU instead means you can put $20-80 more towards the graphics card and get significantly more performance in the form of a 280/280X (or a 760 if you lean Nvidia). Having that second HDD right off the bat isn't the best choice for a limited budget unless you for some reason are a huge media consumer without already owning any external storage. For a build with the best bang for the buck on a tight budget, I recommend investing in 1) a platform with an upgrade future 2) the best CPU you can afford if you're doing anything that needs CPU horsepower (streaming, certain games, encoding, content creation) and 3) the best GPU you can afford if you're doing anything that needs GPU horsepower (gaming, GPGPU). Those are the 3 most expensive items. Everything else is several times cheaper and can be upgraded in the future. A Coolermaster Hyper 212 is the only heatsink anyone really needs and you can get them for $20 on sale or $30 regularly, equalling CLCs or heatsinks up into the $60-80 range.

    I have to agree with other people questioning the recommendation of an APU. With the A10-7850k, you're paying for the iGPU. If you're buying a discrete GPU that means it's a waste of money. Yes, the AM3+ platform is effectively dead, but while the FM2+ platform may be more up to date, it's still lagging far behind Intel. AM3+ is significantly better bang for the buck with a discrete GPU if you're looking at AMD, but the best, serious bang for the buck while having good chipset freatures is Intel, hands down (sadly...). You can either get a huge increase in multithreaded performance with AM3+ for a little less money going the 8350 route or equivalent CPU performance going for the much cheaper, often on sale 6300. (No real reason to go for an iGPU-less AMD CPU quad core since the 6300 is the same price/$10-20 more for 50% more performance) AMD motherboards are also cheaper than Intel ones so you can potentially spring for certain "nicer" features without having to spend more. You're just locking yourself into a dead end platform, but if you're on a tight budget and/or plan on upgrading your PC several years down the line when you have more money, it doesn't matter. Upgrading just the CPU on an Intel build when say Broadwell comes out is a huge waste of money unless you're coming from a very low end Haswell (again, for those on a tight budget like this article addresses).

    The advice I'd say to focus on though is just figure out your needs and then buy as much CPU and/or GPU as you can for that. RAM and storage is easy to add later on when you have more money. But replacing a CPU/GPU means you've got a couple hundred dollar paperweight laying around (unless you can reuse it).
    Reply
  • hojnikb - Saturday, August 9, 2014 - link

    Actually, value Corsair PSU are pretty crap for the money, since their 12V power rating is very poor (cx v2 600W only has 480W on 12V).

    I believe seasonic or XFX 450/550/650W offer the best quality and 12V power rating for the money.
    Reply
  • garadante - Sunday, August 10, 2014 - link

    I have no idea which power supply you're talking about, because I looked at half a dozen Corsair CX power supplies, competitively priced, and every single one had a 12v rail supplying very close to its maximum wattage. There may be some bad PSUs in Corsair's value lineup, but overall they're a good brand. Their high end PSUs are untouchable by the competition. Reply
  • hojnikb - Sunday, August 10, 2014 - link

    dont know what corsair you have been looking for, but as can be seen here http://www.realhardtechx.com/index_archivos/Page44...

    pretty much all of their CX and VS lineup "overrates" their maximum power and only 750W models come close to providing all of their available power to the 12V rail. And 30C rating is pathetic aswell.

    XFX and Seasonic provide much better value (and power on 12V) for the money. Atleast here in EU anyway.
    Reply
  • garadante - Sunday, August 10, 2014 - link

    I looked at that link, and every single CX PSU still in production has a 12v rail wattage close to its maximum wattage. Make sure you're not looking at discontinued products. We're talking products people can actually buy. Corsair has had some less than desirable PSUs but recently their PSUs have been rather good. Reply
  • iTzSnypah - Saturday, August 9, 2014 - link

    You must have no idea who Super Flower is.... Reply
  • just4U - Saturday, August 9, 2014 - link

    With the 7series A-8s now showing up I'd say there is literally no conceivable reason to go with a A-10 as long as price is close to i5.. What you save you can either pocket or put to use for something else in the system. Reply
  • Gadgety - Sunday, August 10, 2014 - link

    Midrange AMD: I'd build it with the A8-7600, save $65, forget about any add on GPU, and be done for $577. It's close enough to the A10 series in performance, but user less power. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now