Performance Consistency

We've been looking at performance consistency since the Intel SSD DC S3700 review in late 2012 and it has become one of the cornerstones of our SSD reviews. Back in the days many SSD vendors were only focusing on high peak performance, which unfortunately came at the cost of sustained performance. In other words, the drives would push high IOPS in certain synthetic scenarios to provide nice marketing numbers, but as soon as you pushed the drive for more than a few minutes you could easily run into hiccups caused by poor performance consistency. 

Once we started exploring IO consistency, nearly all SSD manufacturers made a move to improve consistency and for the 2015 suite, I haven't made any significant changes to the methodology we use to test IO consistency. The biggest change is the move from VDBench to Iometer 1.1.0 as the benchmarking software and I've also extended the test from 2000 seconds to a full hour to ensure that all drives hit steady-state during the test.

For better readability, I now provide bar graphs with the first one being an average IOPS of the last 400 seconds and the second graph displaying the standard deviation during the same period. Average IOPS provides a quick look into overall performance, but it can easily hide bad consistency, so looking at standard deviation is necessary for a complete look into consistency.

I'm still providing the same scatter graphs too, of course. However, I decided to dump the logarithmic graphs and go linear-only since logarithmic graphs aren't as accurate and can be hard to interpret for those who aren't familiar with them. I provide two graphs: one that includes the whole duration of the test and another that focuses on the last 400 seconds of the test to get a better scope into steady-state performance.

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance

For a mainstream drive, the 850 EVO mSATA/M.2 does relatively well in IO consistency except for the highest capacity 1TB model. Strangely enough the 2.5" 1TB 850 EVO does just fine, so this issue seems to be limited to the mSATA version. 

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Consistency

Looking at the standard deviation reveals why: the IO consistency of the 850 EVO mSATA 1TB, even with overprovisioning, is horrible compared to the rest of the 850 EVO lineup. 

Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
Default
25% Over-Provisioning

The issue with the 1TB mSATA is actually worse than I expected because it's literally stopping for seconds in a frequent manner. The pauses can even be over 50 seconds, so this isn't just some normal garbage collection that's happening in the background. I find this to be very alarming because it may have dramatic impact to user experience and it's simply something that no modern SSD should do anymore. I did let Samsung know about my findings before publishing this review, but I wasn't really able to get any comment from them regarding this issue and whether Samsung has noticed something similar in its internal tests. Adding over-provisioning seems to help as the pauses become much more infrequent, but for now I would still advise against buying the 1TB mSATA version until there's a fix for the IO consistency.

As for the other capacities, the 850 EVO has excellent consistency and steady-state performance for a mainstream drive. The capacity has some effect on performance, but even the 250GB model has roughly twice the performance of 240GB Ultra II thanks to faster V-NAND.

Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
Default
25% Over-Provisioning
Introduction, The Drives & The Test AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer
Comments Locked

58 Comments

View All Comments

  • nmm - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Uninteresting releases like this are the reason M.2 is having so much trouble gaining traction. Desktop users have no reason to choose the M.2 variant since they'll get similar performance out of a much more versatile SATA variant. The only obvious reason I can see to buy mSATA/M.2 versions of this drive is if you've got a laptop that can't slot a regular 2½" SATA drive. What a waste of shelf space.
  • bricko - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    These are all way slow and almost outdated. INTEL and others coming out with NVMe and PCIe 3 stuff that are 2 to 4 times as fast. Big event from INTEL listed here.
    http://www.pcper.com/news/General-Tech/PCPer-Live-...

    Best to have an X99 mobo to make them bootable. Lots of these m.2 stuff is not bootable without lots of bios messing etc. Lots of info here

    http://www.thessdreview.com/our-reviews/intel-ssd-...

    http://hothardware.com/reviews/Intel-SolidState-Dr...
  • blanarahul - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Those drives will cost upwards of 0.8$/GB. So you can't really compare those drives with these ones.

    Not to mention, they would be HHHL cards instead of M.2 and they use 20nm NAND which is almost 2 generations old.
  • bricko - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Many of the m.2 sticks run very hot and manu are insertin g them into adapter cards to fit in pcie slot.
    Here is link to one....but its been removed from server and being sold before the consumer version is out. The cost is enormous because no other supply yet, but should be out to consumer in day or 2.
    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00L0LFKQW/ref=wl_it_dp_o...

    here is m.2 adapter card with heat sink for the samsung 941 ssd drive to put into pcie slot

    http://www.amazon.com/Sintech-PCI-e-Adapter-Samsun...

    but again, these early ones are difficult to make bootable, need x99 mobo and to get the nvme you need windows 8.1 which has native driver.
  • bricko - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Here is link to intels countdown clock for their big announcement on m.2 ssd

    http://www.intelgamingpromo.com/intel15b/ssd/notic...
  • bricko - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link

    Mushkin Hyperion M.2 SSD Reaches 2.8GB/s and 350K IOPS

    http://www.thessdreview.com/daily-news/latest-buzz...
  • Kristian Vättö - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link

    While I'm under NDA for that announcement, what I can tell you is that there's no M.2 coming tomorrow.
  • bricko - Wednesday, April 1, 2015 - link

    Good explanation on how and what these new m.2 drives are and what you need to get them to work.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/answers/id-2468965/ssd...
  • SunLord - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    I was so hoping to see a m.2 42mm option from Samsung...
  • WackyDan - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Same here... So these aren't available in 42mm?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now