Performance Consistency

We've been looking at performance consistency since the Intel SSD DC S3700 review in late 2012 and it has become one of the cornerstones of our SSD reviews. Back in the days many SSD vendors were only focusing on high peak performance, which unfortunately came at the cost of sustained performance. In other words, the drives would push high IOPS in certain synthetic scenarios to provide nice marketing numbers, but as soon as you pushed the drive for more than a few minutes you could easily run into hiccups caused by poor performance consistency. 

Once we started exploring IO consistency, nearly all SSD manufacturers made a move to improve consistency and for the 2015 suite, I haven't made any significant changes to the methodology we use to test IO consistency. The biggest change is the move from VDBench to Iometer 1.1.0 as the benchmarking software and I've also extended the test from 2000 seconds to a full hour to ensure that all drives hit steady-state during the test.

For better readability, I now provide bar graphs with the first one being an average IOPS of the last 400 seconds and the second graph displaying the standard deviation during the same period. Average IOPS provides a quick look into overall performance, but it can easily hide bad consistency, so looking at standard deviation is necessary for a complete look into consistency.

I'm still providing the same scatter graphs too, of course. However, I decided to dump the logarithmic graphs and go linear-only since logarithmic graphs aren't as accurate and can be hard to interpret for those who aren't familiar with them. I provide two graphs: one that includes the whole duration of the test and another that focuses on the last 400 seconds of the test to get a better scope into steady-state performance.

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Performance

For a mainstream drive, the 850 EVO mSATA/M.2 does relatively well in IO consistency except for the highest capacity 1TB model. Strangely enough the 2.5" 1TB 850 EVO does just fine, so this issue seems to be limited to the mSATA version. 

Steady-State 4KB Random Write Consistency

Looking at the standard deviation reveals why: the IO consistency of the 850 EVO mSATA 1TB, even with overprovisioning, is horrible compared to the rest of the 850 EVO lineup. 

Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
Default
25% Over-Provisioning

The issue with the 1TB mSATA is actually worse than I expected because it's literally stopping for seconds in a frequent manner. The pauses can even be over 50 seconds, so this isn't just some normal garbage collection that's happening in the background. I find this to be very alarming because it may have dramatic impact to user experience and it's simply something that no modern SSD should do anymore. I did let Samsung know about my findings before publishing this review, but I wasn't really able to get any comment from them regarding this issue and whether Samsung has noticed something similar in its internal tests. Adding over-provisioning seems to help as the pauses become much more infrequent, but for now I would still advise against buying the 1TB mSATA version until there's a fix for the IO consistency.

As for the other capacities, the 850 EVO has excellent consistency and steady-state performance for a mainstream drive. The capacity has some effect on performance, but even the 250GB model has roughly twice the performance of 240GB Ultra II thanks to faster V-NAND.

Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 250GB
Default
25% Over-Provisioning
Introduction, The Drives & The Test AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer
Comments Locked

58 Comments

View All Comments

  • cleverdude - Saturday, April 18, 2015 - link

    Bench results have not been updated.
    http://www.anandtech.com/bench/SSD/65
  • szhosain - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    On my Lenovo W530 laptop (about 3 years old now), I just installed a Samsung 850 EVO MSATA 1TB card, and ATTO shows me poorer numbers than seen here. About 267 MB/sec for write and 280 MB/sec for read when it peaks. My 2.5" SSD drives (from OCZ) in the same system are well over 500 MB /sec.

    Does this perhaps mean that the MSATA interface on this laptop is limited to 3 GB/sec rather than the 6 GB /sec on the standard SATA interfaces?

    That would be quite irritating!
  • Ethos Evoss - Sunday, June 21, 2015 - link

    When it comes to mSATA or M.2 connected to SATA III there is no point purchase stupid expensive SSDs as they will perform same as cheapest ones ..
    So best mSATA/m.2 SSD for SATA III use is the plextor or mushkin (i preffer plextor) which cost less and has great performance
  • Andrew Field - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    This Samsung SSD 850 EVO mSATA constantly overheats. This is especially the case when copying large files. It rises about 10C every 30-60 seconds, and does not stop until its own overheating protection kicks in. This occurs when it is in a laptop or in an external enclosure (even when open and exposed to the air).

    Initially I thought I had a bad piece of hardware, but I tested 5 separate units with consistent results.

    If anyone decides to test this out, I did the following:
    - Step 1: Select a folder with at least 100GB of data
    - Step 2: Copy said folder to a new folder (on the same Samsung SSD 850 EVO mSATA)
    - Step 3: Monitored the temperature
    Result: The temperature begins rising sharply in a few seconds, and does not stop rising until the SSD engages its overheating protection.
  • greywarden - Thursday, September 17, 2015 - link

    I was about to purchase (4) 250GB 850 EVO mSATA drives to put in an Addonics quad mSATA PCIe card, but seeing the latency numbers on the drive has me concerned. Should I look into purchasing a pair of the 500GB models instead? Have the pausing and crashing problems been solved with the 1TB model yet?
  • payamfi - Tuesday, January 19, 2016 - link

    Hi guys i wanna buy a memmory for my n551jx i can not decide what to buy msata evo mini or ssd evo pro can anyone help me out?
  • fabbrimichele75 - Friday, March 25, 2016 - link

    Would it be possible to know the temperature when the disk is in idle and full load?
    I'm mainly interested in the M.2 version.

    I'm asking because I wanted to mount it on an NUC 6i5 that seems to be sensitive to high temperature.
  • yolomolo - Tuesday, April 19, 2016 - link

    Can i get some advice from you PRO, should i better go get mSata : Samsung EVO 850 or CRUCIAL MX200 ?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now