Intel’s New Adaptive Boost Technology: Floating Turbo Comes to Rocket Lakeby Dr. Ian Cutress on March 19, 2021 9:00 AM EST
A couple of days after Intel officially announced its 11th Generation Core Rocket Lake, the press received an email about a new feature coming to the platform that wasn’t in our original briefing. The goal of this feature is to provide more performance to users that have good processors, and Intel is calling it Adaptive Boost Technology.
Adaptive Boost Technology is now the fifth frequency metric Intel uses on its high-end enthusiast grade processors, and another element in Intel’s ever complex ‘Turbo’ family of features. Here’s the list, in case we forget one:
|Intel Frequency Levels|
|Base Frequency||-||The frequency at which the processor is guaranteed to run under warranty conditions with a power consumption no higher than the TDP rating of the processor.|
|Turbo Boost 2.0||TB2||When in a turbo mode, this is the defined frequency the cores will run at. TB2 varies with how many cores are being used.|
|Turbo Boost Max 3.0||TBM3
|When in a turbo mode, for the best cores on the processor (usually one or two), these will get extra frequency when they are the only cores in use.|
|Thermally Velocity Boost||TVB||When in a turbo mode, if the peak thermal temperature detected on the processor is below a given value (70ºC on desktops), then the whole processor will get a frequency boost of +100 MHz. This follows the TB2 frequency tables depending on core loading.|
|Adaptive Boost Technology||ABT
|When in a turbo mode, if 3 or more cores are active, the processor will attempt to provide the best frequency within the power budget, regardless of the TB2 frequency table. The limit of this frequency is given by TB2 in 2-core mode. ABT overrides TVB when 3 or more cores are active.|
|*Turbo mode is limited by the turbo power level (PL2) and timing (Tau) of the system. Intel offers recommended guidelines for this, but those guidelines can be overridden (and are routinely ignored) by motherboard manufacturers. Most gaming motherboards will implement an effective ‘infinite’ turbo mode. In this mode, the peak power observed will be the PL2 value. It is worth noting that the 70ºC requirement for TVB is also often ignored, and TVB will be applied whatever the temperature.|
Intel provided a slide trying to describe the new ABT, however the diagram is a bit of a mess and doesn’t explain it that well. Here’s the handy AnandTech version.
First up is the Core i7-11700K that AnandTech has already reviewed. This processor has TB2, TBM3, but not TVB or ABT.
The official specifications show that when one to four cores are loaded, when in turbo mode, it will boost to 4.9 GHz. If it is under two cores, the OS will shift the threads onto the favored cores and Turbo Boost Max 3.0 will kick in for 5.0 GHz. More than four core loading will be distributed as above.
On the Core i9-11900, the non-overclocking version, we also get Thermal Velocity Boost which adds another +100 MHz onto every core max turbo, but only if the processor is below 70ºC.
We can see here that the first two cores get both TBM3 (favored core) as well as TVB, which makes those two cores give a bigger jump. In this case, if all eight cores are loaded, the turbo is 4.6 GHz, unless the CPU is under 70ºC, then we get an all-core turbo of 4.7 GHz.
Now move up to the Core i9-11900K or Core i9-11900KF, which are the only two processors with the new floating turbo / Adaptive Boost Technology. Everything beyond two cores changes and TVB no longer applies.
Here we see what looks like a 5.1 GHz all-core turbo, from three cores to eight cores loaded. This is +300 MHz above TVB when all eight cores are loaded. But the reason why I’m calling this a floating turbo is because it is opportunistic.
What this means is that, if all 8 cores are loaded, TB2 means that it will run at 4.7 GHz. If there is power budget and thermal budget, it will attempt 4.8 GHz. If there is more power budget and thermal budget available, it will go to 4.9 GHz, then 5.0 GHz, then 5.1 GHz. The frequency will float as long as it has enough of those budgets to play with, and it will increase/decrease as necessary. This is important as different instructions cause different amounts of power draw and such.
If this sounds familiar, you are not wrong. AMD does the same thing, and they call it Precision Boost 2, and it was introduced in April 2018 with Zen+.
AMD applies its floating turbo to all of its processors – Intel is currently limiting floating turbo to only the Core i9-K and Core i9-KF in Core 11th Gen Rocket Lake.
One of the things that we noticed with AMD however is that this floating turbo does increase power draw, especially with AVX/AVX2 workloads. Intel is likely going to see similar increases in power draw. What might be a small saving grace here is that Intel’s frequency jumps are still limited to full 100 MHz steps, whereas AMD can do it on the 25 MHz boundary. This means that Intel has to manage larger steps, and will likely only cross that boundary if it knows it can be maintained for a fixed amount of time. It will be interesting to see if Intel gives the user the ability to change those entry/exit points for Adaptive Boost Technology.
The other difference is that for now, ABT on Intel is disabled by default. Users will have to enable it in their BIOSes to take advantage. On that scale, I suspect most won't, simply because most do not enter the BIOS. Enthusiasts might, however they might also decide to overclock, which makes ABT moot. The other alternative is that motherboard vendors will enable it by default anyway, simply because Intel says it is within specfication.
The Final Word
It’s a bit odd that Intel decided to talk about this feature two days after the official Rocket Lake announcement, to the point that BIOSes enabling ABT are only being distributed now (this doesn’t affect our Core i7-11700K review). This indicates that perhaps the feature wasn’t ready in time for the announcement, or even, ready to go and Intel was still debating whether to actually make it a feature? Then again, all of the Z590 motherboards that we’ve seen seem overbuilt for this generation of processors – Z590 starts at $175, which used to be a mid-market price, so something like ABT should be ready to go. It does make me wonder if ABT is applicable for B560 motherboards, or if it will be a Z590 only feature. Intel has stated that ABT is within warranty and not considered overclocking.
There will be some users who are already familiar with Multi-Core Enhancement / Multi-Core Turbo. This is a feature from some motherboard vendors have, and often enable at default, which lets a processor reach an all-core turbo equal to the single core turbo. That is somewhat similar to ABT, but that was more of a fixed frequency, whereas ABT is a floating turbo design. That being said, some motherboard vendors might still have Multi-Core Enhancement as part of their design anyway, bypassing ABT.
Overall, it’s a performance plus. It makes sense for the users that can also manage the thermals. AMD's implementation allowed it to get additional performance when it moved to TSMC’s 7nm. I have a feeling that Intel will have to shift to a new manufacturing node to get the best out of ABT, and we might see the feature on the more mainstream CPUs.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Beaver M. - Monday, March 22, 2021 - linkIm taking it. IDK what you want from a CPU, but I only care about real world performance. Only secondly about power draw. If they give me 200 extra MHz for free, I would be stupid not to take it.
Some special kind of AMD users seem to hate additional performance... but only if its for Intel. ;)
Spunjji - Monday, March 22, 2021 - link"I only care about real world performance"
Then you'll be buying an AMD CPU, presumably? 😁
Jokes aside, though, did you read the bit where they pointed out that this is only on the i9 SKU? The only difference between this and MCE is that MCE is guaranteed up until your CPU hits the thermal throttling limit, and this just isn't - so by your own metric, you want MCE and not this "feature".
Bagheera - Monday, March 22, 2021 - linksome special kinds of Intel users think they actually get more performance with Intel chips.
GeoffreyA - Tuesday, March 23, 2021 - linkThat is the power of Intel Inside and GenuineIntel.
dwillmore - Friday, March 19, 2021 - linkAMD intruduced this back in 2018/4 in Zen+ where they had an processor that actually had thermal headroom and could make use of it--especially on the lower end processors with more thermal headroom.
Intel introduces it in 2021/3 and only on high end processors made from a 10nm processor design back ported to a fairly power hungry 14nm process where they have little thermal headroom--so the feature doesn't end up doing all that much.
nandnandnand - Saturday, March 20, 2021 - linkIt presumably helps create a performance gap between the barely distinguishable i9 and i7, and makes sure that the i9-11900K wins at gaming consistently over Zen 3. Intel's fans will pony up the cash, and AMD's prices will drop, so it's a win-win.
Qasar - Saturday, March 20, 2021 - link" and makes sure that the i9-11900K wins at gaming consistently over Zen 3. "
how would you know this ? has there been a review of this posted ?
going by the 11700k review on here, the 11700k looks to lose more often to the 5800x then it wins, even losing in some games to the 9900k. the 11900k may close that gap, but it may not be by much, and, while using more power then the 11700k does.
SaturnusDK - Sunday, March 21, 2021 - linkNot sure how you see the 11900K win over zen 3 in games. By just the CPU MSRP the 11900K competes directly with the 5900X which is a few percent better overall than the 5800X. Given the preview test of the 11700K it seems unlikely that the 11900K will bridge the gap up to the 5900X. It may be relatively on par with the 5800X but then you're looking at a $90 price disparity just going by the MSRP, nevermind the added cost for more expensive MBs, coolers and PSUs.
So the 5900X will almost certainly continue to be the gaming king CPU, and slaughtering the 11900K in anything else except extremely niche avx512 tests that aren't really useful for any consumer, and never will be.
Availability is really the only thing holding AMD back still. Although 5600X/5800X now seems to be in general stock everywhere at MSRP, the 5900X/5950X are still hard to find. Two of my freinds have pick up one each in the last 14 days at just $20 and $30 over MSRP so it seems that is improving as well.
Spunjji - Monday, March 22, 2021 - linkThe sort of lolcows who buy an i9 K and don't overclock but do bung a chiller on top will love this.
For everyone else, you're right, it makes painfully little sense.
Hulk - Friday, March 19, 2021 - linkReminds me of the P4 "Emergency Edition."