Why the iPhone 5 Lacks Support for Simultaneous Voice and LTE or EVDO (SVLTE, SVDO)by Brian Klug on September 14, 2012 2:24 AM EST
So we've seen the new iPhone, and had a chance to briefly play with it at the demo room, but as I've learned in the past so many times you only really know a handset after you've taken a look at the FCC test reports or spent a few days with it yourself. On my flights home, I typed up our iPod and EarBud impressions piece, but also pored over those FCC test reports for the iPhone 5, and it became immediately obvious the iPhone 5 doesn't support simultaneous voice and data on CDMA2000 carriers such as Sprint and Verizon in the US.
The reasons, as always, are somewhat technical but at a high level pretty simple. Suffice it to say that at a high level this is a design decision which makes the phone as small and light as it is (it really is light, almost alarmingly so) and enables it to support a wide number of LTE bands, rather than some major oversight like I've seen it portrayed.
First, a bit of overview. At the Apple event there were two physical hardware models for the iPhone 5 announced: A1428 and A1429, with three different provisioning configurations. There are hardware differences between the two models, and what provisioning boils down to is both how the phone is initially provisioned, and likely what AMSS (Advanced Mobile Subscriber Software - Qualcomm's software package that runs on the baseband) gets loaded at boot. This is analogous to how with iPhone 4S there was a single hardware model, but two different configurations for CDMA and GSM.
For the most part, the two hardware models are identical, and to most users the two models will be indistinguishable, but there are physical differences to accommodate a number of different LTE bands between the two. The Apple iPhone 5 specs page lists this at a high level, and there's an even more explicit LTE specific page with a list of what LTE bands work for what carriers. Of course, what ultimately really matters is what's in the FCC docs and in the hardware, and looking at those there are a few more bands supported than listed for LTE.
Why this is the case is interesting and a function of transceiver and Apple's implementation – with Qualcomm's transceivers (specifically RTR8600 in the iPhone 5, but this applies to others as well), each "port" is created equal, and can handle WCDMA or LTE equally. If your design includes the right power amplifiers (PA), filters, and antenna tuning, you're good to go, which is why we see LTE testing reports for bands that aren't listed otherwise. I saw this same behavior with Apple's test reports for the iPad 3 with LTE as well, there were many more tested configurations than what any carrier in the USA will run, but remember Apple's approach is about covering as many possible configurations as possible with the fewest number of SKUs.
I've made a table of what the cellular band support breakdown is for the three iPhone 5 configurations:
|Apple iPhone 5 Models|
|iPhone 5 Model||GSM/EDGE Bands||WCDMA Bands||CDMA 1x/EVDO Rev.A/B Bands||LTE Bands (FCC+Apple)|
|A1428 "GSM"||850/900/1800/1900 MHz||850/900/1900/2100 MHz||N/A||2/4/5/17|
|A1429 "CDMA"||850/900/1800/1900 MHz||850/900/1900/2100 MHz||800/1900/2100 MHz||1/3/5/13/25|
|A1429 "GSM"||850/900/1800/1900 MHz||850/900/1900/2100 MHz||NA||1/3/5 (13/25 unused)|
Note that we now have both quad band GSM/EDGE and WCDMA across all three models. All three configurations support WCDMA with up to HSDPA Category 24 (DC-HSPA+ with 64QAM for 42 Mbps downlink) and HSUPA Category 6 (5.76 Mbps uplink) as far as I'm aware. Only the A1429 "CDMA" configuration supports CDMA2000 1x and EVDO, and interestingly enough even supports EVDO Rev.B which includes carrier aggregation, though no carrier in the USA will ever run it. In addition the FCC reports include 1xAdvanced testing and certification for CDMA Band Classes 0 (800 MHz), 1 (1900 MHz), and 10 (Secondary 800 MHz), so I have no idea why Sprint is saying it won't work with their "HD Voice" (really 1xAdvanced) deployment, but I'm digressing yet again...
Looking at just the LTE band numbers is hard unless you have them internalized, so I made yet another table which focuses just on that aspect:
|Apple iPhone LTE Band Coverage|
|E-UTRA (LTE) Band Number||Applicable iPhone Model||Commonly Known Frequency (MHz)||Bandwidths Supported (MHz)|
|1||A1429||2100||20, 15, 10, 5 (?)|
|2||A1428||1900||20, 15, 10, 5, 3, 1.4|
|3||A1429||1800||20, 15, 10, 5, 3, 1.4 (?)|
|4||A1428||1700/2100||20, 15, 10, 5, 3, 1.4|
|5||A1428, A1429||850||10, 5, 3, 1.4|
|13||A1429||700 Upper C||10, 5|
|17||A1428||700 Lower B/C||10, 5|
|25||A1429||1900||20, 15, 10, 5, 3, 1.4|
So you can see how with two different hardware models, Apple is able to support no fewer than 8 LTE bands with largely the same hardware – the same display, chassis, battery, form factor, and PCB outline (different power amplifiers and filters are required), and roughly the same exterior antennas (gain is different on the primary bottom antenna between the two models, no doubt they're tuned differently). Previously most handsets I've seen have been destined to work only on a single carrier, and thus implement at most one or two LTE bands.
If you look at Apple's iPhone lineup historically, there's this obvious two year cadence which jumps out at you, and it applies even to cellular. I've removed the CPU and GPU parts so this table doesn't get too huge, but historically Apple has been very careful about engineering a platform that will last for a while.
|Apple iPhone - Cellular Trends|
|Release Year||Industrial Design||Cellular Baseband||Cellular Antennas|
|iPhone||2007||1st gen||Infineon S-Gold 2||1|
|iPhone 3G||2008||2nd gen||Infineon X-Gold 608||1|
|iPhone 3GS||2009||2nd gen||Infineon X-Gold 608||1|
|iPhone 4 (GSM/UMTS)||2010||3rd gen||Infineon X-Gold 618||1|
|iPhone 4 (CDMA)||2011||3rd gen||Qualcomm MDM6600||
(Rx diversity, No Tx diversity)
|iPhone 4S||2011||3rd gen||Qualcomm MDM6610 (MDM6600 w/ ext. trans)||
(2 Rx/1 Tx diversity)
|iPhone 5||2012||4th gen||Qualcomm MDM9615 w/RTR8600 ext. trans||
(2 Rx/1 Tx diversity)
It was touched on in the keynote, but the iPhone 5 likewise inherits the two-antenna cellular design that was touted from the 4S. This is the original mitigation for iPhone 4 "deathgrip" which was introduced somewhat quietly in the iPhone 4 (CDMA), and carried over to the 4S with one additional improvement – the phone included a double pole, double throw switch which allowed it to change which antenna was used for transmit as well to completely quash any remaining unwarranted attenuation. While receive diversity was a great extra for the 4S that drastically improved cellular performance at cell edges, in LTE 2-antenna receive diversity is now thankfully mandatory, leaving the base LTE antenna configuration a two-antenna setup (two Rx, one shared for Tx). Thankfully, Apple already had that antenna architecture worked out with the 4S, and carried it over to the iPhone 5.
So now that we're done with all that, where the heck does simultaneous voice and data fit into the picture? Again, it comes down to antennas, design decisions, and band support.
First a bit of history: first generation LTE phones on Verizon used a combination of two cellular architectures to deliver both LTE and CDMA1x/EVDO capabilities. Quite literally there were two basebands, two transmit chains, and at least three antennas: a two-antenna setup for LTE, and 1 transmit for CDMA 1x/EVDO duties. Usually this boiled down to a shared diversity receive antenna for LTE and CDMA 1x/EVDO, and discrete transmit antennas for LTE and CDMA1x/EVDO.
Samsung Galaxy S 3 for VZW (SCH-I535) antennas (3 for cellular)
Modernizations from Qualcomm have since reduced the number of digital basebands required to just one (with MSM8960 and MDM9x15) which helped improve battery life, but the end implementation still requires the same three-antenna solution. This configuration enables both SVLTE (simultaneous voice and LTE) and SVDO (simultaneous voice and EVDO) with one modem but still requires those two transmit RF chains to work for CDMA phones. I should mention that these methods are all in place to accommodate the fact that as of yet almost no CDMA networks implement VoLTE (Voice over LTE or Voice over IMS), except MetroPCS. To make this single radio simultaneous LTE and CDMA architecture work requires making another RF path.
On WCDMA/GSM carriers, the path forward until we get to VoLTE is what's called circuit-switched fallback (CS-FB). This quite literally means you drop from 4G LTE to 3G WCDMA (where voice and data are already multiplexed) for the call, then hand back up to LTE when you're finished. This is the way that voice works at the moment for all GSM/WCDMA carriers, and on all those handsets with LTE to date.
From iPhone 5's FCC Test Reports
So onto the iPhone – we know definitively that the iPhone 5 definitely doesn't support either SVDO or SVLTE. It's as simple as looking at the FCC documents and the appropriate sections in the allowed and tested simultaneous transmitters section for SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) testing. There, it's spelled out that only one air interface can be active at a time, and that only one antenna can be selected for transmit at a time. There's also an explicitly called out mention to VoLTE not being supported at present. I didn't replicate the entire table of simultaneous transmission combinations which need to be tested (it is a huge table) there are no entries with CDMA Voice being active at the same time as any data mode save WiFi. This has been confirmed as well by later statements by the carriers and Apple.
From Apple's perspective, no doubt the iPhone 5 not supporting simultaneous voice and data on CDMA carriers isn't the end of the world. After all, iPhone 4 and 4S customers have ostensibly been using their phones without that functionality just fine for some time now – this is just a logical extension. At the same time, LTE handsets on Verizon and Sprint which currently support both SVDO and SVLTE will have a differentiator, and from what I've been told the inclusion of SVDO is more of a "delighter" than core feature.
What it really boils down to is that by using this single Tx chain, Apple is able to support a ton of LTE bands (more space for PAs and fewer transceiver ports used on SVLTE for CDMA networks) and also do it without making the iPhone very large. Moving to an architecture that works with SVDO and SVLTE would require an additional transmit path and antenna, and incur a size and weight penalty. The other reality is that CS-FB is the way voice coexists with LTE in the vast majority of cases globally, and thus engineering all that just for CDMA networks is at odds with Apple's ultimate desire to deliver as few models as possible.
In the future all of this overhead to implement voice with legacy 3G and 2G networks will largely go away and exist only as a handover option for when LTE service isn't available. Voice over LTE is indeed coming soon.
Update: The other LTE related iPhone 5 thing to explain is why LTE support for 800 MHz and 2.6 GHz isn't present. This article originally started as an explanation for why SVLTE and SVDO support are not absent, I think there's even more discussion necessary about what the likely plan of attack from Apple is for including both more LTE bands and that TD-SCDMA phone for China. I plan to address that in our upcoming review.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
ananduser - Friday, September 14, 2012 - linkSo, what do I care ? Let's stop fooling around and admit that the iphone lacks a pretty important feature. It's deficient in this area compared to the S3 or some other devices and that's it. No more "but, but... Apple". I have no problem with it , I do mind however the whining for Apple from their fans.
KPOM - Friday, September 14, 2012 - linkNo one is saying it isn't an inconvenience for some and something to consider. However, the whole point of this article is to talk about the technical and design rationales.
People complained that the new iPad was thicker and heavier than the iPad 2. Part of that was because Apple made the decision to use an older LTE chipset. Well had they used the older chipsets in the iPhone 5, they might have not had the complaint about lack of simultaneous voice and data, but may well have had complaints that they couldn't improve the battery life or weight of the phone. Maybe they could have added a third antenna, but then we might be hearing about the next "antennagate." We don't know. This just explains why Apple did what they did. If it's a deal breaker for you, then it's a deal breaker. If it isn't, it isn't. Apple's probably guessing it isn't for most people.
jecastejon - Friday, September 14, 2012 - linkI don't think so, it is a design decision. Apple could use an additional space and weight to add a bigger battery or any other feature they considered vital, but obviously from Apple's perspective and strategy the weight and dimension is very important. Now, is that the way to go? It remains to be seeing, but pre-orders sold out in one hour.
IKeelU - Friday, September 14, 2012 - linkLet's not get ahead of ourselves - pre-orders would've sold out regardless of how Apple made this trade-off.
KPOM - Friday, September 14, 2012 - linkIt took more than 12 hours for the pre-orders to sell out last year. Part of that is Apple's more aggressive rollout schedule. We also don't know how many they set aside for pre-orders, but in any case it suggests demand is strong.
cmdrdredd - Friday, September 14, 2012 - linkAs if that wasn't known before the pre-order release. Seriously...sheep know no better.
jecastejon - Saturday, September 15, 2012 - linkThe thing is it took an hour not if pre-orders sold out.
...sheep. Read! Your hate jumps before you could finish a sentence.
Focher - Saturday, September 15, 2012 - linkAnd every year, the number of sheep gets bigger and bigger. Along with matching customer satisfaction. Too bad those people do not know that they're dissatisfied.
jihe - Friday, September 14, 2012 - linkIt's a feature saved for iphone 5s
KPOM - Friday, September 14, 2012 - linkIt's good to come to AnandTech and get a technical, but understandable analysis. Also kudos to Anand for getting mentioned in the NY Times.
I'm a bit curious about the iPhone's lack of support for VoLTE, as well. Assuming the carriers implement this, is this something that can be added through a software update, since it will be using the same LTE radio for voice and data? In other words, did Apple just not test it yet because no carrier offers it except MetroPCS, which doesn't offer the iPhone?