Battery Life

One of the big draws of the larger form factor is battery life. Due to fundamental scaling issues, a bigger phone should be able to achieve greater battery life than a small one. This is because a smartphone's PCB generally remains constant in size, so it becomes an increasingly smaller proportion of the overall device size. This leaves increasingly large areas where batteries fill in the gap. In order to quantify just how big of a difference this makes when going from 4.7" to 5.5", we turn to our standardized battery life test suite. For those unfamiliar with our testing, the display is calibrated to 200 nits and all background tasks are disabled in order to ensure that only the foreground task is active in our tests.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

As we previously discussed, the iPhone 6 Plus performs quite admirably in the WiFi web browsing test. As expected, there's a healthy bump over the iPhone 6, but it's not quite a massive leap as a larger battery size might suggest.

Web Browsing Battery Life (4G LTE)

Once again, we see a similar pattern with the LTE web browsing test. Since both phones are based on the same platform, it makes sense that their results track quite closely together as we're only scaling display and battery size within the context of these tests.

However, the web browsing test is a mostly display-bound test, even if there is an SoC efficiency aspect that can make a significant difference. In order to better test SoC efficiency and get an idea of the dynamic range that a phone has in battery life, we turn to our compute-bound tests. Unfortunately, Basemark OS II stops the test too early due to low battery notifications in iOS, so we cannot use that test for a proper comparison to other phones.

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

As shown in these charts, the iPhone 6 Plus manages to sustain a significant boost in battery life when compared to the iPhone 6, and performance is almost identical as well. It seems that the iPhone 6 Plus begins to throttle towards the end of the test simply because it has more time to generate heat rather than any real difference in cooling, as skin temperatures were also around 43C on the iPhone 6 Plus in this test. It's also important to note that the iPhone 6 Plus is rendering at 2208x1242 internally in order to keep proper scaling with the 163 points per inch system that iOS has, which accounts for part of the performance delta.

Overall, battery life on the iPhone 6 Plus ranges between about 20% higher to 40% higher depending on the balance of display power and SoC/baseband power in any given situation. Heavily display-bound situations will be closer to the 20% higher figure while more SoC-bound tasks will tend toward 40% or even higher. Purely idle situations should see even greater improvements as any situation where the display is off will see linear scaling with battery size.

Charge Time

Charge time is one of the key metrics for getting a holistic picture of battery life, as it's impossible to really understand whether a phone will be able to stay mobile as needed without considering recharging. In some cases such as a trade show or travel, it doesn't matter if a phone lasts 20% longer than the competition if it loses all the time gained in time spent on a charger. In order to test this, power is tracked from when the phone is connected to the charger to when it reaches the lowest power draw state on the AC adapter.

Charge Time

Unfortunately, the included charger is the same 5W charger that we've seen for years now. As a result, the iPhone 6 Plus is constrained by the relatively low maximum power that it can put out. Those that wish for faster charging should look into getting an iPad A/C adapter as the iPhone 6 Plus will charge faster when connected to it.

Introduction and "Bendgate" Display and Camera
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • moose0422 - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Agreed, I would much rather own a Windows Phone in the future over another Android device. I feel like Windows Phone offers an experience comparable to iOS, while different, that is still extremely stable.
  • nerd1 - Wednesday, October 1, 2014 - link

    iPhone is a cheap phone using cheap, last-gen components.
  • akdj - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Maybe the opposite? Had to be pretty cheap to develop the first 64bit SoC. Definitely 'last-gen'. Just as Quallcom executives. Every compared Touch ID to ANY implementation on an Android device? Why does my 5s SMOKE my Note 3 playing Asphalt 8 or even Temple Run? It's got half the cores, at half the clock speed with a third the RAM!? Hmmm
    I'm thinking you're not REALLY a 'nerd'. Nerds are usually intelligent.
  • akdj - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Supposed to be
    Just ask Qualcomm
    (&) Ever compared Touch ID ...
    (Sorry. Need an editor;))
  • jimbo2779 - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    While I agree with some of your post it is important to note that the 5S has a tiny low res screen where the note is running a much higher resolution. So the note is having to process a much larger image, the note 3 has almost 3x the pixels to push that the iPhone does it should be able to run much faster it is doing a third of the work.

    Also all of your talk about cores and ram etc are largely moot when talking about games as games have always been a predominantly single process heavy task so they do not benefit from the multiple cores but other types of apps will. Also more cores allow more tasks to run in the background without affecting performance of UI based tasks.

    Most US models of the note 3 came with an Exynos chip at 1.9GHz where the iPhone 5S comes with a 1.3GHz A7, basic maths tells me this is hardly half.
  • Berenz - Thursday, October 9, 2014 - link

    Ignore the maths - look at the stats. iPhone 6 smokes the competition in almost every case:
  • cheshirster - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    Have you seen Nexus 5 test results on anandtech?
  • damianrobertjones - Thursday, October 2, 2014 - link

    The Boxster is an amazing car and doesn't try to kill you, as much, like a 911 does. Yep I owned a 986 2.5l Boxster and currently have a 996 911.
  • happycamperjack - Friday, October 3, 2014 - link

    Iphone 5 was the closest iphone release to Galaxy S3, and it absolutely blew S3 away in terms of performance. It's not even close. Check the Anandtech review here.
    Pretty much every benchmark shows that iphone is better. I'm not an Apple fanboy, I've used multiple iphones and android devices over the years. One thing all androids have in common is they are built like toys. Plasticy and break easily. I have no idea why anyone would pay the same price for a Galaxy compared to iphone.
    I think Android makes a lot more sense as a tablet. Tablets behave more like PC, Androids give you that PC like freedom.
  • theduckofdeath - Monday, October 6, 2014 - link

    When all valid arguments fail, use pointless car analogies....

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now