Apple’s A8X SoC: Bigger and Badder

Over the years Apple has gone back and forth on their SoC designs for the full size iPad. In some cases Apple will use their phone SoC – which was the case as far back as the very first iPad – and in other cases they’ll produce a new SoC just for the iPad. Neither strategy is intrinsically right or wrong, but it does mean that it’s anyone’s guess what Apple will do until they announce it.

Most recently, for the A7 generation of products Apple opted to use the A7 SoC for both the iPhone 5S and iPad Air 1. This ended up being the first time in a couple of generations that Apple didn’t mint an iPad-only SoC, and while we’ll gladly take more power, overall this seemed to work out for Apple. The iPad Air was among the most powerful tablets of 2013 (and holds up well in 2014 as well), showing that even in this highly competitive landscape Apple doesn’t necessarily need to build a dedicated tablet SoC to deliver top-notch performance.

Apple's A8X SoC (Image Courtesy iFixit)

Nonetheless, in keeping with their unpredictable nature for 2014 Apple has once more changed their course and gone back to building a tablet SoC for the iPad Air 2. Named A8X, like Apple’s past tablet SoCs this latest SoC is designed to be a bigger and badder version of Apple’s A8 smartphone SoC, taking the A8 design and building it larger for better performance.

A8X’s design is something we’ve spent quite some time mulling over, and while we haven’t found every answer we’d like to have, at this point we have a solid idea of what Apple has been up to. Unfortunately the chip disassembly and analysis experts Chipworks have not released a die shot for A8X, so we aren’t going to be able to do visual identification of the chip, but there are still quite a few aspects we can uncover from Apple’s published statements and from benchmarking.

Apple SoC Comparison
  A8X A8 A7 A6X
CPU 3x "Enhanced Cyclone" 2x "Enhanced Cyclone" 2x Cyclone 2x Swift
CPU Clockspeed 1.5GHz 1.4GHz 1.4GHz (iPad) 1.3GHz
GPU Apple/PVR GXA6850 PVR GX6450 PVR G6430 PVR SGX554 MP4
Memory Bus Width 128-bit 64-bit 64-bit 128-bit
Memory Bandwidth 25.6GB/sec 12.8GB/sec 12.8GB/sec 17.1GB/sec
L2 Cache 2MB 1MB 1MB 1MB
L3 Cache 4MB 4MB 4MB N/A
Transistor Count ~3B ~2B >1B N/A
Manufacturing Process TSMC(?) 20nm TSMC 20nm Samsung 28nm Samsung 32nm

First and foremost, A8X is quite large. The lack of a Chipworks die shot means that we can’t pin down an exact die size, but the math behind the numbers doesn’t leave too much wiggle room. Apple has stated that A8X features 3 billion transistors, versus roughly 2 billion transistors in the 89mm2 A8. Die size is a far more complex subject than just doing a linear extrapolation of transistor count – SRAM and logic have different densities, and even then different logics will pack better or worse than others – but we expect that A8X’s die size will be somewhere north of A6X’s 123mm2. Anything approaching A5X’s 165mm2 is very unlikely, especially for a 20nm product this early, but this still means that A8X is almost certainly Apple’s second largest SoC to date.

The fact that Apple used A7 in the previous iPad Air means that on top of already being a serious step up in transistor count versus A8, compared to the iPad Air 1 the gap is even larger. A7 occupied 102mm2 and more than 1 billion transistors, so compared to Apple’s previous tablet Apple has come very close to doubling their transistor count within 1 generation. We’ll see the full impact of these changes later on, but it goes without saying that Apple has aimed for a much larger boost in performance between iPad generations this year than they did iPhone generations (and the iPhone 6 was no slouch).

CPU: 3x Enhanced Cyclone

Perhaps the biggest question since Apple’s keynote has been what Apple has spent those extra billion transistors on. While the GPU picture was relatively clear from the start, we’ve known that a larger GPU alone could not explain such a large transistor increase and that there must be more going on. Sure enough, for the first time since going with a dual-core design with the A5 in 2011, Apple has added another CPU core to their design with A8X.

Previous X SoCs have always focused on graphics and memory, so the addition of another CPU was unexpected. “Enhanced Cyclone” is still at the top of its class for both IPC and overall single-threaded performance, and for the last couple of years now this has been Apple’s strongest hand in the CPU competitive landscape. Even when dual-core Apple SoCs have fallen behind in multi-threaded tests it has rarely been by much, so with a 1.5GHz clockspeed even a pair of CPU cores would offer quite a bit of performance.

Geekbench 3 Scores
  Single-Thread Multi-Thread
iPad Air 2 1798 4468
iPhone 6 1610 2881
iPad Air 1472 2663
iPad 4 770 1401

The trick with CPU cores – and why this was such an unexpected change – is that they’re only as good as your ability to use them. The move to dual core CPUs made a great deal of sense even early on, because while most software was (and still is) single threaded, a second core allows background operating system activities to take place without infringing on the performance of the active application. With the OS itself almost never needing more than a core’s worth of performance (and almost always much less), a third core is solidly aimed at app developers and giving them more resources for multi-threaded apps.

As far as built-in apps go, right off the bat Safari should be able to put a third core to good use. Otherwise the benefits will be on a case-by-case basis. Most applications are not multi-threaded or are not able to balance their workloads over multiple cores very well, so outside of Safari the biggest gains are likely to be found in video games and to a lesser extent anything doing heavy image manipulation. The fact that Apple just launched the Metal API should greatly help in this respect, as the low-level nature of the API makes dispatching GPU work from multiple CPU threads far more effective than it was under OpenGL ES. I don’t expect the third core was added just for Metal or game developers, but certainly they stand to be one of the big winners initially.

Apple’s own performance estimate for the A8X CPU is 40% faster than the A7 CPU. This is less than the theoretical gains from the additional core (never mind architectural and clockspeed improvements) and looking at the big picture that’s a fair estimate of the type of performance gains to expect. In lightly threaded workloads this is going to be lower, and in heavily threaded workloads we’re potentially looking at quite a bit more.

Ultimately the inclusion of a third core signals that Apple has reached a point where they’re dissatisfied with the overall performance of two CPU cores and is ready to move on to more. Because not every task will benefit from multiple cores Apple still needs to improve on single-threaded performance every generation – a task that will become harder and harder. But with Apple already winning the single-threaded performance race, the relatively small size of an additional core means they can afford to go a bit wider without blowing their die size or power budgets, and this appears to be exactly what they’ve done. Apple has until now resisted in going with large numbers of CPU cores – unlike virtually every other player in the ARM SoC space – and while I don’t think this is vindication for vendors that have tried to push so many (weaker) cores so soon, it does show that a larger core count has its place; that after you’ve gone deep you can still go wide. I suspect in due time we’re going to see the iPhone go the same route – though probably not in A9 – and for the time being a third core, like a larger memory bus, will be a further advantage reserved for the iPad.

GPU: Apple-Modified Imagination PowerVR "GXA6850"

Update: This article has been changed since initial publication. Please see Apple A8X’s GPU - GXA6850, Even Better Than I Thought

Unlike Apple’s CPU choice, Apple’s GPU choice is far more conventional. Ever since Apple went Retina with the iPad 3 and needed to drive more pixels the company has outfitted the X class SoCs with faster GPUs, and A8X is no exception.

With 8 clearly visible GPU clusters on the A8X die shot, it appears that Apple has taken the GX6450 design from A8 and created a new design from it, culminating in an 8 cluster Series6XT design. Officially this design has no public designation – while it’s based on an Imagination design it is not an official Imagination design, and of course Apple doesn’t reveal codenames – but for the sake of simplicity we are calling it the GXA6850.

Compared to the A7 SoC in the iPad Air 1, Apple is touting A8X as having 2.5x the GPU performance as A7. This comes from a combination of the larger GPU configuration, the higher efficiency of the PowerVR Series 6XT architecture, and what we expect is a mild increase in the GPU clockspeed. Getting exactly 2.5x is going to be very situational since it relies on exploiting those aforementioned architectural improvements, but even in cases where that cannot happen the GXA6850 in A8X should be much faster than A7 or even A8.

The only real unexpected part of this is that Apple went with a larger eight-cluster configuration despite retaining the same 2048x1536 resolution display. With the iPad 3 and 4, a larger GPU made perfect sense since the iPad had such a higher resolution than the iPhone. Now in the last year Apple has shown that a four-cluster GPU configuration is capable of driving this display, and with the resolution bump on the iPhone 6 the iPad no longer has the large resolution advantage it once did.

Ultimately from a performance standpoint an eight-cluster configuration is greatly appreciated, but comparing iPad Air 2 to iPhone 6 Plus, the iPad Air 2 is nowhere near twice as many pixels as the iPhone 6 Plus. So the iPad Air 2 is “overweight” on GPU performance on a per-pixel basis versus its closest phone counterpart, offering roughly 30% better performance per pixel. Apple certainly has gaming ambitions with the iPad Air 2, and this will definitely help with that.

Memory: 2GB LPDDR3, 128-bit Memory Bus

The third piece of the A8X puzzle is the memory configuration. In keeping with Apple’s traditional designs for X class SoCs and the iPad in general, Apple has moved to off-package memory on the iPad Air 2. In place of A8’s POP 1GB of LPDDR3, the iPad Air 2 takes on two LPDDR3 modules, for a total of 2GB of RAM. This is the first time Apple has shipped an iOS device with 2GB of RAM – having unexpectedly stuck to 1GB for the iPhone – which should go a long way towards alleviating any memory pressure from the combination of the Retina display and 64bit applications.

A8X w/2GB RAM (Image Courtesy iFixit)

iFixit’s teardown has revealed a pair of Elpida modules, though like the iPhone Apple is most likely multi-sourcing here. These modules are rated for the same LPDDR3-1600 speeds as those found on the POP RAM on A8, so Apple hasn’t touched the clockspeed here at all, instead they have merely doubled up on the RAM and widened the memory bus to match.

Given that Apple is now using a six-cluster PowerVR GPU configuration, the return of a 128-bit memory bus was to be expected. Even feeding a four-cluster configuration is no doubt memory bandwidth limited at times, and a eight-cluster configuration would only make that much worse. The good news here is that by doubling their available memory bandwidth Apple should have quite a bit of memory bandwidth to play with – 25.6GB/sec to be precise – which admittedly still isn’t a lot by PC or console standards, but it’s huge for an SoC. More importantly, this keeps up with the doubled GPU performance, as the GXA6850 should have no problem consuming that much bandwidth. In the end the 128-bit memory bus has long been one of the traits of the X series SoCs, and like in previous iPads it should deliver quite a bit of performance for Apple.

Meanwhile as this is the first X class SoC from Apple since the introduction of the A7, it’s interesting to note that the additional memory bandwidth from the 128-bit memory bus is available to the CPU as well as the GPU. On A6X and A5X the CPUs cores were not able to access the full memory bandwidth as halfof it was reserved for the GPU. However A7 introduced the 4MB L3 cache, which is shared by the GPU and the CPU, which means bandwidth segregation is no longer practical. As a result our bandwidth numbers come close to the theoretical bandwidth available to A8X, though it looks like a single core would have a hard time consuming quite that much bandwidth.

Speaking of the L3 cache, we can confirm that it’s unchanged for A8X. It remains at 4MB, just as it was for A8 and A7. Though as we can see from our latency test, we don't start hitting the 4MB of L3 cache for another 1MB, as the larger L2 cache is able to hold our transfers for longer.

Wrapping things up, the increases in the memory bus, GPU cluster count, and CPU core count should account for almost all of A8X’s roughly 1 billion transistor increase. Adding so much GPU and CPU horsepower doesn't come cheap from a die space perspective, but it makes for an extremely potent processor in A8X.

Introduction CPU Performance
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • robinthakur - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    Lol, you hit the nail on the head there. You can't even install OTA updates on rooted Android devices with custom recoveries without restoring the stock one and most banking apps don't work on them either. To do either you need a PC opr a mac and you need to use the command line. How user friendly is that?

    The last time I took off the custom recovery and put stock back onto my HTC One M8 and then tried to update, it wiped all the data off of the phone. After that, I bought an iPhone 6 Plus and am much happier and more secure in the knowledge that my phone backs up automatically overnight (every night) to iCloud. Having used iPhones since 2007, iTunes hasn't been required for mnost things since the iPhone 4 launched in 2010
  • craighamilton - Saturday, December 6, 2014 - link

    Truly amazing, one of the high rated tablet. You should take a close look at the guide at
  • NEDM64 - Saturday, November 8, 2014 - link

    Exactly, if you are like in tens of thousands in a pool of hundreds of millions, over the history of 7 years, you may get that...

    That's the problem, you get updates on iOS, while on Android... unless you buy the "right device" you may have something like 18 months of updates.

    And what's the problem with iTunes then? I've it running on my Windows box, and for the monster of multipurpose App it is, it consumes next to nothing of RAM.

    At least is a easy to use and stable program...

    Contrary to the Nexus "fastboot" command line tools...

    And most of software that Android vendors make you install, like Samsung KIES, that's great software, isn't it?
  • carloshehe - Sunday, November 9, 2014 - link

    OS updates aren't too necessary on Android. You can still run all the latest apps. U like iOS, apps have no OS version requirements.
  • akdj - Monday, November 10, 2014 - link

    I'm not sure I've read such a backward comment in my life.
    As an owner of bit iOS and Android devices (latest hard/software), your experience is undoubtedly 180° different than mine
    My nine year old is still enjoying the iPad 2, even with the current version of iOS he's enjoying ten to twelve hours of better life
    Same can't be said for the 'Xoom' ...or the nexus 7 ('12) ...I'm not sure when I pulled out the 2013 ?Nexus 7
    That said, when it comes to 'tablet apps' and 'choice' the Hundreds of THOUSANDS ...the Android tablet experience is an absolute, utter and catastrophic Joke!
    I love my Note3. Looking forward to possibly updating to a Note 4 --- but four years of getting butnt by the tablet development community and its lack of interest in 'developing' for the Android tablet community, I'm done
    Though a bit curious. iPad Air 2 drops (have one btw and its everything the reviews cracked it up to be, plus! -- & I'm coming from the original Air, my wife the iPad 4 she didn't want to give up. Case thing). And so does the price of the new Nexus 9?
    Why? Wasn't it a 50% drop? Maybe I dreamt it....not sure, and not knocking the Nex9. That said, there's only so much you can do with the UI of your springboard. At some point its time to use your tablet to do something
    When that time comes, you'll be glad you chose iOS, regardless of your interest, hobbies, media you enjoy to play, media to manipulste or create. Music, video/still and artistic creation on the iPad ...its apps and its options are second to none ...
    Thanks for the write up.
    What a slab
  • Michael Bay - Tuesday, November 11, 2014 - link

    Your shilling is beyond pathetic.
  • noelbonner - Tuesday, November 11, 2014 - link

    There are way better phones according to CONSUMER BASED rankings, just see
  • valnar - Sunday, November 16, 2014 - link

    I reject the very foundation of that article. Treating a phone like a computer misses the point. It is absolutely NOT important to pick a phone based on the resolution, camera or power. Battery...ok yes.

    What's more important are the apps it runs, how easy is the UI, stability, speaker & mic quality, etc. The things that matter in a smart phone. The ±10% speed or rez differences in various phones is irrelevant.
  • akdj - Thursday, November 27, 2014 - link

    Huh. Amazing that year in, year out they contine breaking sales records from the previous launch customer satisfaction has remained in slot #1 for damn near every quarter since 2007 and as far as 'better' phones, even the connotation being subjective ....ultimately and objectively there isn't a "better phone". Just different now
    2007/08 and the introduction of the SDK & the App Store completely changed a massive, easily one of the top five, maybe three 'growing' areas of our world today. Wireless comms first for voice first (remember 'Can you hear me now?' And the days of Nextel, Blackberry corporate dominance and shitty analog coverage?)
    ...we've moved into 'texting' in a signficantly easier way than the Nokia flip phone with 12, standard 'phone' buttons and their associated three letters. Apple introduced in '07 a game changing, corporate smashing product that continues to better iteseld with each iteration. I've owned em each and because of how our company is run...we also provide employees with iPhones/iPads while I carry both. 6+ and Note 4. They've voth got their places and the sizes of their displays is a life saver to this mid 40s guy
    I can't see anything anymore when it comes to reading. Cheaters or Else...
    (Wal mart reading glasses;))
    BUT, today's HiDPI dispays at 5-6" in these svelte profiles and 'weight' (lack of) with their Power, speed, efficiency and reliability --- ultimately make it 'that time' in history.
    Telecommunications changed the world early in the 20th century. An extension of Moorse code. Voice to voice. Operators and analog switch boards and Mama Bells reign/monopoly on America's 'booming' new technology. All analog. All switched on site. Patch cords that my grandmother ran for almost forty years and plenty of advancements ...all the way until 'digital" phone lines were installed and the history of the 'switcher' is just that. History

    Which two birds one stone BS, valnar underneath is tells is the 'very foundation of (sic) article....'
    And I quote, "Treating a phone like a computer MISSES the point". They're VERY MUCH a computer, that fits in your pocket and performs much faster than computer we were building and drafting, coding and editing, emailing and surfing, playing games and 'communicating' with not JUST voice but video, text 'artistic creation!'
    To dismiss a smartphone as inferior to a computer in ANY way shows a significant generational gap
    When your mobike, wireless provider allows for the speeds of LTE (I'm routinely between 35/40Mb/s down and 40150 UP!
    That's ubelievable when I think back to my IIe, Ultima I, II, III ...Booting to the promot 'BRUN ..xxxxx'
    To 33!& 54 baud modems, the handshake noise like yesterday and was floored with the performance of SSD va HDD. Bluetooth's progression and the idea of an IPU, MPU....gyros and accelerometers ...if you'd sit back five minutes and think about their sheer 'abilities', other than 'Us, and these that frequent Anand's site ...and enjoy technology, the mass population is easily taken care of with 95-98% of all comouter tasking they were doing in 2010 on 110/220 (plugged in) ...
    ...Today being done on a gram measured in grams, a few hundred at that and fit in your pocket. They're reliable. They aggregate, integrate and oranizate;) everything about my life and 27 year business
    As a pilot I can't begin to describe the differences between gettin my pilots license in 1987 and today. From GPS to LTE, TCAS to ADSB ...planning my trip and checking real time weather, calculating fuel and picking my diversions if needed. Jep charts n plates and app/dep up to the minute changes to your approach or arrival ...hell, even with an app, Flight 24 I bekeive...if you've got it you can follow a loved one all the way through to landing and gate release. Leave your house with perfect timing lol
    Honestly, there just AREN'T 'way better phones'. Apple, HTC, LG, & of course samsung have helped each other
    For me, I wouldn't be caught without both. I want to know the differences, what going to help me and be the most compelling reason to choose that platform, OS or Eco system
    They ARE computers. Possibly you didn't ride DOS, the intro to 8086 and 8/16/32/64 bit programming and hardware but the amazing Moore's law has taken over. I, for one, couldn't. E happier.
  • akdj - Thursday, November 27, 2014 - link

    "And I quote, "Treating a phone like a computer MISSES the point". They're VERY MUCH a computer, that fits in your pocket and performs much faster than ThE computer(s) we were building with and drafting (the initial CAD, paint,motion and still editing), coding and emailing surfing or producing a song, video (or both) in Los Angeles at a studio or your home swimming pool , playing games and 'communicating' with not JUST voice but video, text 'artistic creation' and SOOO much easier than a 'computer' in SO many cases, situations and emergencies and for the vast majority of our population today than yesterday
    IF ALL you need is a phone, I'm with you. There's a better flip phone with those dozen digits, # & * as well as the 'green' & 'red' buttons on top and middle 'select'
    If you're going to use your phone for more than calls, indeed, you'll find your iPhone,mS5 G3 or the latest Lumia to be a HELLUVA lot closer to a comouter than you're implying.
    That said, if this is an extremely rare circumstance and you're working opposite me with my 4k conversions and encoding, I concur;)
    There afain though ...our last two docs have used footage from iPhones and Androids (not a WinPhone yet unfortunately ...but I'm one of nine peeps that I think enjoy Win8.1. I'm OS X based and only own two Windows machines now...but I digress, my point was even my iPhone works perefectly on Win 8.1 does iTunes! I'm pretty floored how quick it (now is, I left to OS X personally and with the business after a really bad crash in Vista in 2007---& hadn't looked back until earlier this year when I needed a Win rig. Bought an HP 2/1 slab or attachable and all aluminum body core i5. It's pretty cool having CS6 suite on a (albeit extremely large and unwieldy) tablet ...
    I am rooting for all of them. That said, Mt View and Cupertino have vertical and horizontal aggregation and integration. Google doesn't. The former two's run deep and have history, trust ... Obviously fans with zest but IF a phone isn't s computer, Android/Google better spens some serious time on Chrome;)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now