Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks

Storage bridges that support UASP fully can translate the SCSI UNMAP command to TRIM commands for SSDs connected to the downstream port. Checking for TRIM support has been a bit tricky so far. CyberShadow's trimcheck is a quick tool to get the status of TRIM support. However, it presents a couple of challenges: it sometimes returns INDETERMINATE after processing, and, in case TRIM comes back as NOT WORKING or not kicked in yet, it is not clear whether the blame lies with the OS / file system or the storage controller / bridge chip or the SSD itself. In order to get a clear idea, our TRIM check routine adopts the following strategy:

  • Format the SSD in NTFS
  • Load the trimcheck program into it and execute
  • Use the PowerShell command Optimize-Volume -DriveLetter Z -ReTrim -Verbose (assuming that the drive connected to the storage bridge is mounted with the drive letter Z)
  • Re-execute trimcheck to determine status report

Conclusions can be made based on the results from the last two steps. For the ToughTech Duo C, we first tested out TRIM support for one of the drives in a JBOD configuration.

Given that TRIM support doesn't exist even for JBOD configuration, there is no point testing out the RAID configurations. CRU indicated that they are waiting for support from ASMedia to issue a firmware update with TRIM support. So, it is conceivable that we will be able to get TRIM support in the future for the JBOD configuration, at the least.

One of the interesting aspects that deserves mention again is the bus-powered nature of the unit. There is a LED indicator to inform users of the need to use a power adapter. But, we found in our testing with multiple PCs that a green light doesn't necessarily mean that the adapter is not necessary. In certain bus-powered cases, we found that the internal volume would mount, but, hang in the course of some stressful operations. In some cases, using a shorter Type-C to Type-C cable resolved the issue. In other cases, we had to use the power adapter. The symptom and resolution varied from system to system. It also depends on the power consumption of the 2.5" drives used in the enclosure. For completely flawless operation, it is advisable to use the AC power adapter irrespective of the USB POWER LED status.

The CRU ToughTech Duo C is currently available only on CRU's product page. There are various SKUs available with pre-installed hard-drives and SSDs. The diskless enclosure is priced at $179. This is quite steep compared to the $89 for the MiniPro RAID V3 from Oyen Digital. The latter even supports 2.5" drives that are 15mm thick, compared to the 9.5mm drives supported by the ToughTech Duo C. However, the ToughTech Duo C has easily removable drive bays and a more compact profile. Based on the user manual of the MiniPro RAID V3, it appears that the ToughTech Duo C is simpler to configure and operate.

The CRU ToughTech Duo C belongs to a unique class of products enabled by the emergence of the USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-C standard. It is a good fit for a variety of use-cases involving backups and the necessity for fast storage. Our only point of concern is the pricing compared to other similar products in the market. Based on CRU's profile, it appears that the majority of their business is selling to big companies and government agencies - $179 is a price that those entities might be willing to pay for the ToughTech Duo C. From the perspective of the average consuer, it is just a bit too high despite the industrial design deserving a premium.

Thermal Aspects and Power Consumption
POST A COMMENT

25 Comments

View All Comments

  • iranterres - Friday, November 18, 2016 - link

    Anandtech is in a wave of uninteresting reviews...sadly. Reply
  • Charlie22911 - Friday, November 18, 2016 - link

    Speak for yourself, as a person who travels and has had multiple Seagate\Western Digital portables fail I found this to be both relevant and informative. Reply
  • MrSpadge - Friday, November 18, 2016 - link

    Yep - didn't know such an option exists. Reply
  • Samus - Friday, November 18, 2016 - link

    Trollolol Reply
  • BrokenCrayons - Friday, November 18, 2016 - link

    I thought the review was interesting. Although I'm not searching for external storage, this is something different that warrants a look as it's not a single drive enclosure. The fact that it has RAID1 support might make it useful to quite a few readers. Reply
  • bug77 - Tuesday, November 22, 2016 - link

    True, but I think most people will just slap mechanical HDDs in the enclosure and the review doesn't say anything about that... Reply
  • BrokenCrayons - Tuesday, November 22, 2016 - link

    Yeah, I can't argue with that. External storage enclosures are good candidates for mechanical drives. It's a really common scenario since a lot of people aren't as concerned about speed as they are about high capacity and cost effectiveness. On the other hand, testing with mechanical drives will be more of a test of the drives' performance than the enclosure since SSDs are probably the only things quick enough to push the USB interface hard enough to expose any shortcomings. Reply
  • bug77 - Tuesday, November 22, 2016 - link

    It's not like testing with both SSDs and HDDs is unthinkable... Reply
  • powerarmour - Saturday, November 19, 2016 - link

    +1 Reply
  • rocketman122 - Monday, November 21, 2016 - link

    I agree somewhat.. As of late not so interesting reviews and they are less frequent. I think (me specifically) they should do a review of a product every day or 2. So much to review. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now