Visual Inspection

Biostar's Racing line of motherboards seem to come in two varieties - either completely color neutral or with a number of stripes and primary colors across the board. The Z490GTN fills the slot in the former, with the main accents being the heatsinks using a 30-degree incline as a form of consistent styling. The 'Racing' logo on the power delivery heatsink to the left of the socket is also angled, and in a metallic finish. There are no LEDs on board, however there is a +5V and +12V LED header for additional customization.

The socket area on the board isn't as cramped as it first seems, although the power delivery heatsink to the left does appear tall. The DRAM modules on the right hand side do appear to be at Intel's minimum requirements for distance, so perhaps thin and tall heatsinks might be preferred here. The socket area does look clean, however, and the chipset heatsink is at a lower height due to its proximity to the PCIe slot, which has to cater for the large and bulky graphics cards.

The top left of the board has a slot for a Wi-Fi add-in card, although Biostar does not include one for the standard $200 package. This is unfortunate, as adding in even Wi-Fi 5 here would make the board better value. Next to this is the 8-pin 12V connector for CPU power, and thankfully this is at the edge of the motherboard. We've seen quite a few mini-ITX variants over the years put this connector next to the middle of the rear IO panel, which makes cable routing a mess, but putting it here at the edge of the board is preferable.

Moving to the right, we have the two RGB connectors mentioned previously, and two of the board’s 4-pin fan headers. There is a third 4-pin header, although it sits just above the PCIe slot, which might make its use difficult with large graphics cards. Continuing at the top of the board, we have two DDR4 slots with dual latches, which Biostar say is capable of up to 64GB of DDR4-4400. Biostar uses the Daisy Chain topology for its memory here, which it claims allows for better overclocking support. We tried our DDR4-5000 kit, just to see if it would work - unfortunately not!

Beneath the 24-pin ATX power connector are our four SATA ports, and these ports are designed to enable users to remove any locking SATA cable without needing to remove others - this is why we see this reversed layout, and it's one that I've been advocating for for quite a while. The other storage option, the PCIe 3.0 x4 slot, is found on the rear of the board, as is typical with mini-ITX designs. Beneath the SATA ports is a USB 3.0 front panel header and the front panel connector.

At the bottom of the board is the PCIe 3.0 x16 slot, reinforced with what it calls 'Iron Slot Protection'. This is becoming a standard on most motherboards, at least for the primary PCIe slot, especially as high-end graphics cards get heavier and systems are transported - the Iron Slot Protection (and its equivalents) help reinforce the slot so it doesn't tear out of the PCB in these situations.

The Biostar Racing Z490GTN is using a 6+2 power delivery which is controlled by an ON Semiconductor PCP81229 PWM controller operating in 6+2 mode. For the CPU section, there are six ON Semiconductor NCP302155 55 A power stages, with two NCP302155 55 A power stages for the SoC. Cooling the CPU section of the power delivery is a simple aluminium heatsink with small inserts to direct airflow. It isn't very bulky however.

Above the PCIe slot is the chipset and chipset heatsink, along with the third 4-pin fan header and USB 2.0 header - this isn't a great place for a USB 2.0 header to be honest, just because the cables will be a mess to arrange. The audio header is just behind the audio rear panel outputs, and this is sandwiched in with the audio caps on the other side - a bulky audio connector designed for high quality audio signal transfer might have issues fitting in this space. The audio codec used is the Realtek ALC892, usually the codec for cheaper motherboards and slightly above the base ALC887 option, but given this product is $200 we really should be seeing the ALC1150 at a bare minimum here.

On the rear panel we have a combination PS/2 port, two USB 2.0 ports, a HDMI output, a D-Sub analog output, four USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (5 Gbps), the Intel I215-V gigabit ethernet port, and the three audio jacks.

People often question the use of a PS/2 port on modern motherboards - to be honest, on my testing systems, I use them where possible just because as an interrupt based protocol, I can guarantee entry into the BIOS with it. There is the downside of not being able to plug one in without turning the system off, but some of these systems also end up in legacy equipment, and require these connectors (same with the D-Sub video output).

$200 used to be a strong battleground for ATX motherboards, with each motherboard having one specific high-end feature to help promote it. The only 'high-end' feature here on this Biostar board above the standard is that Intel I215-V gigabit Ethernet port. We really should be seeing an ALC1150 codec on a board for this price, and adding in Wi-Fi (even Wi-Fi 5) would sweeten the deal.

What's in The Box

Included in the very light accessories bundle with the Biostar Racing Z490GTN are four SATA cables, an IO shield, a DVD driver installation disc, a quick installation guide, and a wireless interface installation bracket.

  • Four SATA cables
  • IO shield
  • Driver and software installation disc
  • Quick installation guide
  • Wireless interface installation kit
Biostar Racing Z490GTN Overview BIOS And Software
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • DanNeely - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    The only chipset on the market that needs active cooling is the AMD 570, because PCIe 4.0 is a power hog.
  • PeachNCream - Sunday, June 7, 2020 - link

    Absolutely it will be fine. The vast majority of reasonably designed motherboards need no active cooling anywhere. The few that add them do so because of PCIe 4.0 (currently only an AMD side thing) or fans are slapped onto VRMs to hide poor design decision under the guise of "overclocker friendly voltage regulator cooling enhancements" so people throw more money at supposedly higher margin parts while feeling like they are somehow obtaining greater value that justifies the expenditure. Classic marketing is still alive and well because, despite generations of exposure to it, we haven't gotten much smarter about identifying and coping with it.
  • eastcoast_pete - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    Thanks Gavin and Ian! Fully agree - way overpriced for what it has and can do.
    One suggestion, especially for boards that are likely to be used in an HTPC: please include the exact HDMI version supported (with specs) as well as any information on display port and Thunderbolt
    capabilities, including, of course, complete absence of such features. Thanks!

    As for the current state of affairs with Intel in the HTPC space: they are lucky that AMD has not made Renoir chips available for socketed mini-desktops, or they could kiss that market goodbye.
  • Slash3 - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    Socketed Renoir is on the way.
  • lmcd - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    AM4 seems pretty big for ITX based on the ASRock board I have. This board might be bad but Intel should still have an upper hand, unless Comet Lake is bigger than past socket + chipset pairings?
  • Deicidium369 - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    has the same HSF hole spacing - so about the same size - it's only 49 additional pins
  • lmcd - Saturday, June 6, 2020 - link

    I meant the chipset.
  • eastcoast_pete - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    Unless I overlooked it, a review of AM4 mini ITX Boards would be interesting, if just for comparison. There are even a couple of x570 boards with PCIe 4.0 for about the price of this board here available, and they include Thunderbolt and WiFi connectivity, and a much better audio. However, my own preference would be for a cheaper B450 or 550 board for about half the price; that's enough for an HTPC setup.
  • Spunjji - Monday, June 8, 2020 - link

    How would a smaller socket+chipset give them the upper hand for HTPCs when Renoir offers better CPU performance for a given TDP and markedly superior graphics?

    AM4 might be "big for ITX", but that's irrelevant if you can still build an ITX system around it.
  • Operandi - Friday, June 5, 2020 - link

    Looks like a pretty weak / inefficient VRM.

    Speaking of which if you are going to cover the VRM section of a board you need to go into more detail than simply stating the VRM configuration. 6+2 is almost meaningless when the quality of MOSFETS and drivers is what really determines how much power a board is capable of delivering and how efficient it will be. With the specs of the components involved and the layout along with some simple math is pretty easy to ballpark what a board is capable of.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now