HTC's New Strategy - The HTC Oneby Anand Lal Shimpi on February 26, 2012 3:45 PM EST
HTC begins 2012 with the reveal of a new unified brand strategy. Although HTC as a company has made significant progress in attaining mindshare, its devices lack a single focus to compete with the likes of Apple’s iPhone or Samsung’s Galaxy S brands. HTC, like many of its competitors, chose to spread its brand equity across multiple device brands like EVO, Sensation, Thunderbolt, Desire, and so forth. Moving forward, HTC is hoping to change that with the introduction of a new unified brand to do battle with these other brands: the HTC One.
The goal is that you’ll be able to walk into any mobile operator store, in any region, in any part of the world and ask for the HTC One. There will still obviously be variants of the One, but the brand will remain constant across them.
Today HTC is announcing the first three members of the HTC One family: the HTC One X, HTC One S and HTC One V. We’ve played with all three phones and they’re easily the best phones we’ve ever seen come from the company. HTC initially allowed no photos of devices, but we'll update as soon as some are released.
Note: The performance data contained within this article is based off of preproduction hardware and software. Final performance can (and will likely) change from what you see here. There's a ton of optimization work that still needs to be done, both for performance and stability. We'll of course provide full coverage once we have final hardware in hand.
The HTC One X
The One X is the new flagship phone from HTC. If features a 4.7-inch 1280 x 720 Super LCD II (not PenTile) display and a quad-core NVIDIA Tegra 3 (AP33) SoC running at up to 1.5GHz. 1080p video encode and decode are both supported.
Despite the large screen size, the One X felt perfect in my hand, arguably even better than Samsung’s Galaxy Nexus did. The One X measures 134.6mm x 69.9mm x 9.27mm.
Internally the phone features DC-HSPA+ (42Mbps) support as well as dual-band 802.11a/b/g/n. The US version will feature LTE but I’ll get to the differences between that model and the HSPA+ version in a moment. NFC and Bluetooth 4.0 are supported. The One X features 1GB of LPDDR2 memory, the current standard for high-end Android smartphones.
The back of the One X is plastic but the phone itself feels dense and very high quality. The phone will be offered in both a white and dark grey, almost black, finish. Overall I was very impressed by the One X, it was definitely one of my favorites of all of the Android phones I’ve interacted with. HTC has been spending quite a bit of time on improving build quality and being a bit less conservative on design, and it shows.
The front facing camera is backed by a 1.3MP sensor capable of capturing images at 720p. The rear facing camera uses an 8MP sensor behind a F2.0 lens assembly.
The styling of the One X embodies HTC’s newfound focus on simplicity. There’s only a single LED flash on the back but with five different intensity levels. The front features no physical buttons, not too uncommon for a modern Android phone and expected for one running Ice Cream Sandwich. The One X has an integrated (non-removable) 1800mAh battery. If we assume it’s a standard 3.7V chemistry that puts it at 6.66Whr. There’s also no removable storage support, just 32GB of eMMC on-board.
On the back of the phone is a dock connector that can be used with an optional car dock. When docked the One X launches a 4-ft UI optimized for operation while driving. All of the icons are larger and you can easily swipe between screens allowing you access to Google Maps, music, and so on.
As I mentioned above, the One X runs Android 4.0.3 however HTC has added its own UI customizations on top of it. Sense 4.0 does feature some nice customizations, for example the task switcher is now a Windows Phone/webOS like horizontal list of windows that you can scroll through. Just as is the case with the regular ICS task switcher, you can quit applications from the Sense task switcher - just fling them off the screen (ala PlayBook OS, webOS).
Wireless Display Support
The One X has wireless display support, presumably via WiFi Display. To take advantage of the phone’s wireless display you’ll need HTC’s Media Link HD dock. Connect the dock to your TV, enable support on your phone, and then simply perform a three finger swipe up on the One X to launch the Media Link HD app. After doing so, anything on your display will be mirrored, wirelessly to your TV. I’m expecting to see wireless display featured in many of the high-end Android smartphones released in 2012.
25GB of Free Dropbox Storage
HTC has partnered with Dropbox to provide all HTC One (not just the X) owners with 25GB of free storage for two years. Access is integrated with Android via HTC’s Sense layer.
The HTC One XL: Krait + LTE for the US on AT&T
Although the standard HTC One X features NVIDIA’s Tegra 3, the version headed to AT&T drops Tegra 3 in favor of Qualcomm’s MSM8960 with integrated LTE. The dual-core MSM8960 runs its Krait cores at up to 1.5GHz. Although it has fewer cores than the One X, each individual core should be faster. It remains to be seen how the two compare from a battery life standpoint (NVIDIA’s companion/battery saver core at 40nm LP vs. lower power consumption from Qualcomm’s 28nm LP process), but performance should be comparable at worst. If we look at GLBenchmark, NVIDIA has a GPU advantage, while Qualcomm likely holds a single threaded CPU performance advantage. Overall I’d expect the tradeoff to be worthwhile, particularly as MSM8960 delivers integrated LTE, but we’ll find out for sure in the next 60 days as both phones become available.
Other than the difference in SoC and baseband, the One XL and One X are identical.
The HTC One S: Krait for the US on T-Mobile
Moving down the lineup is the HTC One S, but you don’t give up performance to get here. The One S trades in the Tegra 3 or MSM8960 for a Qualcomm MSM8260A, another Krait based 28nm SoC but without integrated LTE. The CPU cores in the One S also operate at up to 1.5GHz, making its performance identical (in theory) to the HTC One XL.
The body moves from plastic to aluminum and drops in thickness to a mere 7.9mm. The overall dimensions shrink as well to 130.8mm x 64.8mm.
The screen shrinks compared to the One X/XL down to 4.3-inches. The Super AMOLED (PenTile) panel features a 960 x 540 (qHD) resolution. The front facing camera drops to a VGA resolution, while the rear facing camera (and lens assembly) remain unchanged from the One X.
Battery capacity drops to 1650mAh (6.105Whr @ 3.7V), but power requirements should be lower as well thanks to the smaller, lower resolution screen. Like the One X, the S features 1GB of LPDDR2.
Storage capacity drops to 16GB of eMMC on-board but you still do get 25GB of free storage via Dropbox. 1080p is supported on both the video encode and decode.
One ISP - ImageChip
In an attempt to deliver a uniform camera experience across the HTC One X and S, both feature a discrete Image Signal Processor (ISP) to handle camera sensor output. Rather than relying on the integrated Tegra 3 or Qualcomm ISPs, HTC uses its own ISP called ImageChip for all processing. It’s unclear to me how the external ISP interfaces with the SoC, nor how HTC can guarantee sufficient memory bandwidth to it. As HTC enters the realm of purchasing SoCs from multiple manufacturers, ImageSense is a unique (albeit costly) way of guaranteeing a consistent experience across all devices.
HTC claims its ImageChip enables phones equipped with it to capture images in 0.7 seconds and autofocus in 0.2 seconds. Burst mode is supported as well.
The Sense 4.0 camera app has been greatly improved as well. Video recording now begins immediately upon switching modes from still to video. You can also now capture full sensor resolution images in the middle of recording a video without switching modes by tapping the camera capture button.
The HTC One V
Finally bringing up the low end we have HTC’s One V. The V uses an aluminum unibody design borrowed from the old HTC Legend. Based on a single-core Snapdragon S2 running at up to 1.0GHz, the One V is headed for lower cost regional carriers in the US with availability in late Q2.
The One V has 512MB of memory and 4GB of eMMC on-board with a 1500mAh battery.
We were able to spend some time benchmarking the One X and One S, the results are below. Note that these phones are running preproduction software, the performance you see here isn't final. In the ~60 days between now and launch you can expect to see a lot of performance and stability tweaking across all of these phones.
While the above results were taken using GLBenchmark's offscreen test which disables vsync and runs the benchmark at 1280 x 720, the graph below is run at each device's native screen resolution. For the HTC One X that works out to be 1280 x 720 (921K pixels) and for the HTC One S that is (518K pixels). Keep that difference in mind as the One X does have more (around 77%) pixels than the One S.
The One S (MSM8260A - dual core Krait 1.5GHz) performs surprisingly close to our MDP MSM8960 in many tests. The software build on the One S was pretty immature, it was apparently 10 days old at the time I ran these numbers. We should have time with a device tonight that uses a newer build. The Tegra 3 equipped One X performed very well, easily equaling the Krait based SoC in the browser tests. It remains to be seen how these two SoCs compare in real world browsing tests however. NVIDIA continues to have the advantage in GLBenchmark, and unfortunately due to time constraints we weren’t able to run Basemark on the devices.
HTC's strategy here makes a lot of sense for a host of reasons. First, having a concise and easy branding message makes execution and marketing simpler - just look at the success of Galaxy S II - you can't do that without a unified message. Handset makers really only get one or two opportunities in a two year contract to drive that unified message home, and HTC's new One strategy is the realization of this reality. In addition, doing this on a platform across different SoCs is no longer a huge no-no when the performance margins are narrow enough - Samsung does it, Sony is doing it, and so forth. HTC is going figuratively all-in with this strategy, but the dividends won't start to become readily apparent until HTC One devices start showing up - at this point it does seem like a solid strategy.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
RaistlinZ - Sunday, February 26, 2012 - linkThe ONE XL looks promising. But how is AT&T's LTE network?
HangFire - Monday, February 27, 2012 - linkAT&T's new LTE network? Don't worry, I'm sure it will meet AT&T's high standards for coverage and throughput.
Conficio - Sunday, February 26, 2012 - linkIt is a meaning less addition. Really if you want a simple meaningful and successful naming strategy look at the auto industry. Look at Mercedes, does everybody in the world know what a S class is or what a M class stands for? Add to it one moniker that does express some important attribue. I'd add the screen size, so you know that an X 470 is a 4.7 inch screen while an S 380 is 3.8 inches.
So the X, XL, V and S is the right way to go. The "One just makes the name loger to say and adds no value.
And I can't see where Samsung did anything right. They sell different phone to different carriers with different cores under the same name. And the user experience might be similar, it is still the kind of thing influencers (the geeks) want to deal with. HTC does the right thing, with the X and XL. At least I know I can't buy a XL and use in in non LTE markets.
I sure hope they'll also make the phones on different carriers the same. If a carrier insists on its own version it must co-brand the phone, like AT&T HTC S 380. I know they'll fight who's name is first then, but it clarifies things at least. Or give the S a subscript like HTC Sa 380 for AT&T's version.
Finraziel - Friday, March 2, 2012 - linkHonestly? I have no idea about different models of Mercedes and BMW, exactly because of their letter/number schemes... I do know most other cars where they just give the car a name (I wont name any because it'll mostly be different between Europe and the US). My guess is that if people know about S class or M class, it's because they like Mercedes and it doesn't say anything about wether a single letter is good for marketing or not (I happen to think it's not).
Conficio - Sunday, February 26, 2012 - link... when the lower end phones have aluminum construction. I'd expect the higher value material in the higehr priced phones.
I'd guess it is the dual stream Wifi antenna's that make this material/construction difficult. Anad what do you think or what does HTC say?
LoneWolf15 - Sunday, February 26, 2012 - link"There will still obviously be variants of the One"
But, then, how can it be "The One"? ;)
By the way, what's with all the white phones? I don't get why anyone would want a smartphone that's a noticable dirt-magnet for finger oil, skin, scratches, etc.
tipoo - Sunday, February 26, 2012 - linkSo they wanted to reduce brand confusion by narrowing down their product line to the One. Only problem is, there are a bunch of Ones. Its only slightly better than before, at least now we don't need to find out all the different names.
Another thing, nice to FINALLY see an Android phone come that close to the 4S in the Egypt benchmark. What's the GPU in this again?
tipoo - Sunday, February 26, 2012 - linkHah, nevermind me, its the Tegra 3. I was looking at the MSM.
tipoo - Sunday, February 26, 2012 - linkUgh double nevermind me, we need an edit button :P
I was actually looking at the One S with Krait.
NewForceEX - Sunday, February 26, 2012 - linkAnand,
You've especially highlighted "not PenTile" will make people feel your words might be bias to some other reference. To me, "PenTile or not" Samsung Galaxy Nexus & Galaxy Note represented the best screen that current cellphone product are offering. Millions of people eye don't lie, both of them produces the best color of all cellphone screens, period.
With all the high tech screen, we can forget about screen DPI already. There's no one, absolutely no one will ever watches a cellphone screen the the face sticked onto the screen just to view DPI or sharpness claimed. Furthermore doing that will be totally un-comfortable, not to say that act make one look like a moron. Obviously no one will want to put himself into that un-thinkable embarassing moments.
After all the above remarks, I couldn't understand why One S are the one with better Super Amoled screen. As all of us know, most HTC S-LCD screen quality totally suck. I've know S-LCD are cheap, but why HTC choosed the worst quality screen for their previous flagship model like HTC Sensation XE & XL? Is it because of screen purchase contracts not expire yet? Or is it because they want to earn a big fortune for themself? Or maybe they want to push their stock to much higher value or giving shareholder great dividends?
I have came to understand nowaday most big corporate stock value has been driven to enormous price which are way out of their actual market value. I've know this is market investment driven, but wasn't us has at least learned a lesson from 2008 Wall Street shameful scandal, meltdown or whatever you call them? Big earning those corporate stripped from the poor consumers are insane. Let's hope HTC are not one of them.
Oops.. too much deviation from my main intention. Anand, I sincerely urge you to choose a better approach to accept all new technologies, make unbias reporting that can help to put a better value onto your artciles which also will make them more readable & be appreciated by more readers. Thanks!