Earlier today Microsoft announced its 3rd generation Surface Pro device, aptly named the Surface Pro 3. This is the first Surface model to deviate from the 10.6" 16:9 form factor of all four previous devices (Surface Pro, Surface RT, Surface Pro 2, Surface 2) and instead standardizes on a 12" 3:2 form factor. The resulting device is also substantially thinner, now at 9.1mm (0.36"). Surface Pro 3 is now somewhere between the thickness of Surface 2 and Surface RT.

The original Surface Pro featured a kickstand that could stay open at a fixed 22-degree angle. Surface Pro 2 added another stop (40 degrees) to the kickstand to allow for more flexible, laptop-like operation. Surface Pro 3 features the same initial 22-degree stop, however it can be opened to any angle beyond that (up to 150-degrees) using a new high friction hinge. The hinge opens with little effort to its first stop, anything beyond that requires additional force. It's enough to feel secure, but not too little that the hinge loses its position. It's unclear how this new hinge will hold up over time but I suspect Microsoft put a good amount of testing into it.

With the device width comes a new type cover with a larger trackpad and secondary magnetic strip. The second magnetic strip can provide a second attach point to the Surface Pro 3, allowing the cover to be a more stable base when used in laptop mode. In practice the new hinge with more stable type cover creates a much more laptop-like base, which definitely comes in handy when typing on your lap. In my brief time with the review unit I still found it to be less stable than a laptop, but it's a far closer approximation to the laptop experience than it ever has been before.

The new trackpad is substantially larger horizontally and features a new lower friction surface. The trackpad is actually a clickpad with left/right buttons activated by pushing down on the lower left/right corners of the clickpad itself. Using the integrated trackpad on previous Surface covers was an exercise in madness that got mildly better last generation. 

Right off the bat the new clickpad on the 3rd generation type cover is a lot better, but it's still not in laptop-territory as far as experience goes. I'll need to spend more time with it to see if it's truly past the point of being frustrating to use.

There's a new battery powered pen for Surface Pro 3. You lose some pressure sensitivity (256 levels vs 1024), but there are new features that Microsoft hopes will make up for it. I haven't spent much time with the new pen at all so I'll save commentary on it for the full review.

The new design features the same sized battery as previous Surface models. I'm guessing we'll see a reduction in battery life given the new, presumably higher power display, but I'll find out for sure over the coming days.

Microsoft also added 802.11ac support to the new Surface Pro courtesy of Marvell's Avastar-AC solution (88W8897 perhaps?).

And yes, connected standby is supported.

Microsoft Surface Pro Comparison
  Surface Pro 3 Surface Pro 2 Surface Pro
Dimensions 11.5 x 7.93 x 0.36" 10.81 x 6.81 x 0.53" 10.81 x 6.81 x 0.53"
Display 12-inch 2160 x 1440 10.6-inch 1920 x 1080 w/ Improved Color Accuracy 10.6-inch 1920 x 1080 PLS
Weight 1.76 lbs 2.0 lbs 2.0 lbs
Processor Core i5-4300U with HD4400 Graphics (15W Haswell ULT) Core i5-4200U with HD4400 Graphics (15W Haswell ULT) Core i5-3317U with HD4000 Graphics (17W Ivy Bridge)
Cameras 5MP/5MP (front/rear) 1.2MP/1.2MP (front/rear) 1.2MP/1.2MP (front/rear)
Connectivity 802.11ac WiFi WiFi WiFi
Memory 4GB or 8GB LPDDR3 4GB or 8GB LPDDR3 4GB
Storage 64, 128, 256 or 512GB 64 or 128GB (4GB RAM)
256GB or 512GB (8GB RAM)
64GB or 128GB
Battery 42.0 Wh 42.0 Wh 42.0 Wh
Starting Price $799 $899 $799

Display

With Surface Pro 3, Microsoft finally accepts that while 16:9 may be a great aspect ratio for watching movies but it's not optimal for a multi-purpose tablet. The tablet features a 12" 2160 x 1440 display (RGB stripe, not RGBW/PenTile), which ends up being a 3:2 aspect ratio. The difference is immediately noticeable in notebook-style use. While the Surface Pro 2 was never quite all that comfortable to use as a laptop, Surface Pro 3's display makes it substantially more laptop-like. There doesn't appear to be a substantial impact to tablet use either with the larger display. Particularly with Windows 8.1's split screen mode, the larger display ends up working extremely well. I'll talk about the new hinge a bit more in the usability section but the aspect ratio alone is a huge step forward.


Default Scaling on Surface Pro 3

Color accuracy is improved out of the box as well. The original Surface Pro had a display capable of being quite accurate, if calibrated, but out of the box it was a bit of a mess. Microsoft slowly improved out of box calibration over the years, eventually culminating in what we have today with Surface Pro 3.

Display - Black Levels

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Contrast Ratio

 

Max brightness drops a bit compared to Surface Pro 2, likely due to the Pro 3 having 50% more pixels to light. Black levels at max brightness are pretty good, thanks in part to Microsoft's optically bonded LCD/cover glass stack. Contrast ratio remains competitive with previous designs.

Grayscale accuracy is the biggest issue with the new display, green levels are just way too high:

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Our basic sRGB gamut test paints a great picture for Surface Pro 3. Full saturation color reproduction is excellent:

Display - Gamut Accuracy

The saturation sweep also looks solid:

Display - Saturation Accuracy

Unfortunately Surface Pro 3 doesn't do so well on our GMB color checker test. Part of the problem is its performance in the grayscale swatches included in this test:

Display - GMB Accuracy

Overall the display is a big improvement over the previous Surface Pro generations, but it's still behind iPad Air territory in terms of color reproduction which is disappointing. Given Microsoft's focus on Surface Pro 3 as an image editing tool, I would've hoped for class leading performance across the board.

Performance

Surface Pro 3 still uses a 15W Haswell ULT SoC. My review sample uses a Core i5-4300U (a speed bump of SP2's original 4200U), although there are also Core i3 and i7 options as well. In the case of the i5-4300U we're talking about a dual-core/4 thread Haswell part with a 3MB L3 cache. The CPU cores run at up to a 1.9GHz base frequency and 2.9GHz max turbo. The latter is quite impressive given the incredibly thin (9.1mm) Surface Pro 3 chassis. My guess is that Intel is giving Microsoft the best binned Haswell ULT parts to ensure good performance at low thermals. There are still 4GB or 8GB memory options, although my sample came with 8GB of LPDDR3.

I saw sustained speeds of 2.6GHz while running single-threaded Cinebench 11.5:

The system's internal fan was definitely audible during the Cinebench run.

On the storage front Microsoft is still using a SATA based drive. It's unfortunate that more PC makers haven't shifted to PCIe, although I suspect that'll come next year with NVMe based solutions (I hope). My review sample featured a 256GB Samsung PM851 drive, this is an OEM version of the TLC based Samsung SSD 840 EVO.

Despite featuring a thinner chassis, I measured performance improvements over both previous Surface Pros. I'll have more data in the final review but here I'm seeing a 3 - 20% increase in performance over the Surface Pro 2.

PCMark 7 (2013)

Cinebench R11.5 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R11.5 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Final Words

There's a lot more work to do on Surface Pro 3, including substantial battery life testing and continued usage. If there's anything in particular you guys want to see us touch on, leave it in the comments below.

 

Comments Locked

295 Comments

View All Comments

  • Penti - Tuesday, May 20, 2014 - link

    Hi Anand!

    Can you tell me (us readers) what the exact default scaling is? I'm not fully confident on what exactly the bar shown under "Display" shows, I would guess 150% as it's the third of four steps. Is that accurate? Is that a good level in general on this machine?

    Thanks
  • carleeto - Tuesday, May 20, 2014 - link

    Hey Anand,

    quick couple of things:

    1) How much disk space is used by the default install? In other words, on a 64GB machine, how much space does the user have to play with?

    2) What's the battery life, particularly with something like Lightroom running? I can see this being very useful as a tether for a DSLR.
  • DocForker - Thursday, May 22, 2014 - link

    Disk space listed here: http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msusa/en_US/pd...

    Storage and RAM

    64GB or 128GB storage with 4GB RAM / 256GB or 512GB storage with 8GB RAM2 • 64GB has >36GB available disk space • 128GB has >96GB available disk space • 256GB has >211GB available disk space • 512GB has >450GB available disk space
  • Penti - Tuesday, May 20, 2014 - link

    Nevermind I guess, just say "11:25AM EDT - 6% more content than on the 13-inch MBA's screen" a short while ago which would imply 150% DPI-scaling. Would like to know briefly how it is to use though, how it's perceived.
  • SDreamer - Tuesday, May 20, 2014 - link

    I'd like to know how it supports Connected Standby. The Surface Pro 2 doesn't have it, but the innards of the i5 SP3 supports CS? How are they doing this and can it be replicated on previous Surface Pro models?
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, May 20, 2014 - link

    We have half an answer to your question here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/8038/windows-81-x64-...
  • vyis - Tuesday, May 20, 2014 - link

    Can Ananld also do a test on surface Bluetooth & Wi-Fi issue? All 4 surface thus far have issue when Bluetooth and WiFi use in conjunction. Either getting a extremely slow WiFi or choppy Bluetooth.

    Watching the live stream make me to wonder is this 3 generation in development or defect that last for 3 generation .

    A link to thread of complain on Microsoft answer.
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/forum/s...
  • Daniel Egger - Tuesday, May 20, 2014 - link

    I wonder how the different CPU differentiate given that they're likely all some ultra low power variants of 2 cores + HT Haswell with slightly different frequencies.

    The new display might be nice unfortunately Windows still sucks rocks at UI scaling (changing the DPI breaks many apps that are not used to non-common resolution/DPI combinations -- even application where one would expect it like Steam go completely nuts, changing only the text size doesn't affect most application) and touch usage on the desktop as well so that combination of a high-res touchscreen and Windows looks really horrible to me. As a Surface RT owner it also saddens me to say that even now the amount of useful Metro apps (which wouldn't have these massive problems) is quite lacking...
  • nerd1 - Wednesday, May 21, 2014 - link

    I'm using win8.1 with 125% scaling (11.6" 1080p) and most core application looks fine to me. It's the application developer to blame, not microsoft.
  • jeffkibuule - Wednesday, May 21, 2014 - link

    Difference is likely binning. While the part numbers are largely the same, Intel does extra testing to see which chips use even less power vs others. Remember that while CPU manufacturing is designed to be as reproducible as possible, not every chip is the same.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now