The biggest news to come out of Computex, AMD’s second generation of its Ryzen Threadripper platform, is almost here. Today’s announcement is all amount images, speeds and feeds, specifications, and an ‘unboxing’ announcement, leading to pre-orders a week before retail. As much as it pains me that there is an unboxing embargo and pre-orders before we even know how the new chips will perform, here we are. Today we get to go through the on-box specifications, discuss the design, and show what AMD included in our press kit.

2990WX Pre-Orders Open Today, Retail August 13th

The formal launch of the new parts is one week from today, and in the biggest markets the first processor of the launch should be available for pre-order. AMD is set to launch four versions of its second generation Ryzen Threadripper over the course of Q3, starting with its flagship 32-core.

AMD SKUs
  Cores/
Threads
Base/
Turbo
L3 DRAM
1DPC
PCIe TDP SRP
TR 2990WX 32/64 3.0/4.2 64 MB 4x2933 60 250 W $1799
TR 2970WX 24/48 3.0/4.2 64 MB 4x2933 60 250 W $1299
TR 2950X 16/32 3.5/4.4 32 MB 4x2933 60 180 W $899
TR 2920X 12/24 3.5/4.3 32 MB 4x2933 60 180 W $649
Ryzen 7 2700X 8/16 3.7/4.3 16 MB 2x2933 16 105 W $329

Sitting at the top of the stack is the 32-core 2990WX, which will retail at $1800, competing directly against Intel’s existing 18-core part, the Core i9-7980XE. AMD is using "WX" in the name here to offer some branding consistency with their high-end workstation graphics models, the Radeon Pro WX series.

Beating at its heart are four 12nm "Zen+" Zeppelin dies, each with eight cores, connected by AMD’s Infinity Fabric, and using simultaneous multi-threading for a total of 64 threads. As with previous generations, there are 60 PCIe 3.0 lanes for add-in cards and storage, and another four lanes for the chipset. There is a slight change in the memory speed, with the new parts supporting DDR4-2933.

Joining the WX line is the Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX, set at $1299 MSRP. This 24-core part uses three cores per CCX (so six cores per die, four dies per package), and also has simultaneous multi-threading for a total of 48 threads. Speeds are equal to the TR 2990WX, with a 3.0 GHz base clock and a 4.2 GHz single core turbo. Per-core turbo speeds will be decided by Precision Boost 2 and XFR2, as explained below. The 2970WX is set for an October launch.

Both of the WX models are hitting the new TDP of 250W, although the way AMD measures TDP is heavily dependent on the cooler used. In this case, their new high-end ‘Wraith Ripper’ cooler is the benchmark, which is developed by Cooler Master. This new cooler is very large, but offers full heatspreader coverage – which as we've discovered is critical for Threadripper cooling – and provides good clearance for memory. It will be sold separately in the channel, at around $100 MSRP.

Also on the table are the 2950X ($899) and the 2920X ($649), which use the existing X branding. This is because these processors are direct replacements for the 1950X and 1920X, using only two active dies in each chip, but this time around are using Zen+, the second generation Ryzen features such as faster caches and better frequency characteristics. The 16-core TR 2950X will have a base frequency of 3.5 GHz, a turbo of 4.4 GHz, and is due to launch on August 31st. The 12-core TR 2920X by comparison also has a 3.5 GHz base frequency, but a slightly lower turbo at 4.3 GHz, and is due out in October. Both of these parts are set at 180W TDP, like the first generation chips.

AMD Ryzen Product Stacks & Launch Prices
Ryzen 1000 (2017) Ryzen 2000 (2018)
-   TR 2990WX (32C) $1799
-   TR 2970WX (24C) $1299
TR 1950X (16C) $999 TR 2950X (16C) $899
TR 1920X (12C) $749 TR 2920X (12C) $649
TR 1900X (8C) $599 -  
Ryzen 7 1800X (8C) $499 Ryzen 7 2700X (8C) $329
Ryzen 7 1700X (8C) $399

At this point AMD has not stated if it will expand the family even further, so we don't know if the 1900X will stay at the bottom of the stack, be replaced with a 2000 series model, or if it dies off completely.

At this point, AMD’s main competition is still with Intel’s Skylake-X parts. The 32-core 2990 WX will align in price with the 18-core Core i9-7980XE.

Threadripper 2 vs Skylake-X
The Battle (Sorted by Price)
  Cores/
Threads
Base/
Turbo
L3 DRAM
1DPC
PCIe TDP SRP
Intel i9-7980XE 18/36 2.6/4.4 24.75 4x2666 44 140W $1999
AMD TR 2990WX 32/64 3.0/4.2 64 MB 4x2933 60 250W $1799
Intel i9-7960X 16/32 2.8/4.4 22.00 4x2666 44 140W $1699
Intel i9-7940X 14/28 3.1/4.4 19.25 4x2666 44 140W $1399
AMD TR 2970WX 24/48 3.0/4.2 64 MB 4x2933 60 250W $1299
Intel i9-7920X 12/24 2.9/4.4 16.50 4x2666 44 140W $1199
Intel i9-7900X 10/20 3.3/4.3 13.75 4x2666 44 140W $980
AMD TR 2950X 16/32 3.5/4.4 32 MB 4x2933 60 180W $899
AMD TR 2920X 12/24 3.5/4.3 32 MB 4x2933 60 180W $649
Intel i7-7820X 8/16 3.6/4.3 11 MB 4x2666 28 140W $593
AMD TR 1900X 8/16 3.8/4.0 16 MB 4x2666 60 180W $549
AMD R7 2700X 8/16 3.7/4.3 16 MB 2x2933 16 105W $329

Across the metrics, AMD has more cores, is competitive on frequency, has more memory channels, more PCIe lanes, and supports higher memory clockspeeds. Intel has lower power, and above 16 cores a slight turbo clockspeed advantage. Meanwhile we already know from Ryzen 2000-series testing that cache speeds are a back-and-forth competition, and Intel has a slight IPC advantage. Game on.

What Is New: Zen+ Updates
Comments Locked

101 Comments

View All Comments

  • solnyshok - Monday, August 6, 2018 - link

    Seriously hot, you meant?
  • TheWereCat - Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - link

    My overclocked 1080ti does 350W when playing games.
    It is fairly easy to cool it but yes, the room gets hot a lot.

    I cant imagine doing both GPU and CPU intensive workload for a few houra with the TR2 and the 1080ti and staying in the room (if you dont have an AC like me, its a huge pain).
  • Oxford Guy - Wednesday, August 8, 2018 - link

    That's the price you pay for gaming and for increased power. A long time ago, CPUs didn't even need heatsinks.
  • just4U - Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - link

    Ian, will you be reviewing this with the high-end ‘Wraith Ripper’ cooler? I am curious about it.. Also that cat is awesome looking! More pics with Summer!
  • marsdeat - Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - link

    Some quick typos and errors on the first page that I noticed from citing for Wikipedia.

    Top table "AMD SKUs":
    - 2950X should be $899, not $849
    - 2920X base should be 3.5, not 3.4

    Middle table "Stacks and Prices":
    - 2970WX should be $1299, not $1249

    Bottom table "The Battle":
    - 2950X should be "180 W", the 'W' needs capitalising
    - 2970WX should be $1299, not $1249
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - link

    Right you are. Thanks!
  • rocky12345 - Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - link

    Yea I can not wait for the reviews on the TR 2990WX & the TR 2950X. I do hope they let the reviewers do the reviews for both of the 2 top TR's in their class at the same time. I only say this because even though the TR 2990WX will most likely be able to game it will probably not be that great at it because that is not what it was made for and the TR 2950X being a bit higher clocked and most likely more over clock friendly will be a whole lot better at games.

    SO if we get some reviewers focusing more on just the gaming end of it and then they come to the conclusion of the TR 2990WX sucks at gaming the whole internet will spread the fud around like wild fire. I know Anandtech will do the proper work load tests so this site will be my first go to to get the proper picture.
  • Oxford Guy - Tuesday, August 7, 2018 - link

    AMD already created a gaming mode on the top model of previous Threadripper, which disabled cores. If that doesn't tell people these aren't supposed to be gaming chips what will?

    These are workstation chips. They're for doing work. They will game okay but that is not their purpose at all, especially the more you move up the stack.
  • IntoGraphics - Friday, August 10, 2018 - link

    I wish that those DDR4 prices would come down though.
    64GB is the minimum of my Linux KVM DDR4 requirement.
  • sharath.naik - Monday, August 13, 2018 - link

    there is very little reason to buy intel HCC processors anymore.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now