Section by Gavin Bonshor

X570 Motherboards: PCIe 4.0 For Everybody

One of the biggest additions to AMD's AM4 socket is the introduction of the PCIe 4.0 interface. The new generation of X570 motherboards marks the first consumer motherboard chipset to feature PCIe 4.0 natively, which looks to offer users looking for even faster storage, and potentially better bandwidth for next-generation graphics cards over previous iterations of the current GPU architecture. We know that the Zen 2 processors have implemented the new TSMC 7nm manufacturing process with double the L3 cache compared with Zen 1. This new centrally focused IO chiplet is there regardless of the core count and uses the Infinity Fabric interconnect; the AMD X570 chipset uses four PCIe 4.0 lanes to uplink and downlink to the CPU IO die.

Looking at a direct comparison between AMD's AM4 X series chipsets, the X570 chipset adds PCIe 4.0 lanes over the previous X470 and X370's reliance on PCIe 3.0. A big plus point to the new X570 chipset is more support for USB 3.1 Gen2 with AMD allowing motherboard manufacturers to play with 12 flexible PCIe 4.0 lanes and implement features how they wish. This includes 8 x PCIe 4.0 lanes, with two blocks of PCIe 4.0 x4 to play with which vendors can add SATA, PCIe 4.0 x1 slots, and even support for 3 x PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 slots.

AMD X570, X470 and X370 Chipset Comparison
Feature X570 X470 X370
PCIe Interface (to peripherals) 4.0 2.0 2.0
Max PCH PCIe Lanes 24 24 24
USB 3.1 Gen2 8 2 2
Max USB 3.1 (Gen2/Gen1) 8/4 2/6 2/6
DDR4 Support 3200 2933 2667
Max SATA Ports 8 8 8
PCIe GPU Config x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x8*
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
Memory Channels (Dual) 2/2 2/2 2/2
Integrated 802.11ac WiFi MAC N N N
Chipset TDP 11W 4.8W 6.8W
Overclocking Support Y Y Y
XFR2/PB2 Support Y Y N

One of the biggest changes in the chipset is within its architecture. The X570 chipset is the first Ryzen chipset to be manufactured and designed in-house by AMD, with some helping ASMedia IP blocks, whereas previously with the X470 and X370 chipsets, ASMedia directly developed and produced it using a 55nm process. While going from X370 at 6.8 W TDP at maximum load, X470 was improved upon in terms of power consumption to a lower TDP of 4.8 W. For X570, this has increased massively to an 11 W TDP which causes most vendors to now require small active cooling of the new chip.

Another major change due to the increased power consumption of the X570 chipset when compared to X470 and X370 is the cooling required. All but one of the launched product stack features an actively cooled chipset heatsink which is needed due to the increased power draw when using PCIe 4.0 due to the more complex implementation requirements over PCIe 3.0. While it is expected AMD will work on improving the TDP on future generations when using PCIe 4.0, it's forced manufacturers to implement more premium and more effective ways of keeping componentry on X570 cooler.

This also stretches to the power delivery, as AMD announced that a 16-core desktop Ryzen 3950X processor is set to launch later on in the year, meaning motherboard manufacturers needed to implement the new power deliveries on the new X570 boards with requirements of the high-end chip in mind, with better heatsinks capable of keeping the 105 W TDP processors efficient.

Memory support has also been improved with a seemingly better IMC on the Ryzen 3000 line-up when compared against the Ryzen 2000 and 1000 series of processors. Some motherboard vendors are advertising speeds of up to DDR4-4400 which until X570, was unheard of. X570 also marks a jump up to DDR4-3200 up from DDR4-2933 on X470, and DDR4-2667 on X370. As we investigated in our Ryzen 7 Memory Scaling piece back in 2017, we found out that the Infinity Fabric Interconnect scales well with frequency, and it is something that we will be analyzing once we get the launch of X570 out of the way, and potentially allow motherboard vendors to work on their infant firmware for AMD's new 7nm silicon.

Memory Hierarchy Changes: Double L3, Faster Memory Benchmarking Setup: Windows 1903
Comments Locked

447 Comments

View All Comments

  • trenzterra - Sunday, July 7, 2019 - link

    Hmm, so is it correct to say I can either have 4 or 8 PCIe 4.0 x4 lanes to the CPU? 4 is natively reserved by the CPU and the other 4 is general purpose which could be reserved for this purpose?

    So given 8 lanes of PCIe 4.0 to the CPU, if the chipset supports, say, the use of 16 lanes, does it mean I can use all 16 lanes at once, just that it will run at PCIe 3.0 speeds?
  • ABR - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    As I've asked before with Zen as compared with Intel, please post at least one graph of benchmark performance per watt. Just inferring it based on the last page of the article isn't good enough, especially when the legend on every other graph shows the TDP numbers which we know Intel and AMD determine in different ways.
  • Kishoreshack - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Why Silver?
    They deserve Gold Ratings from Anandtech
    For the same price of Intel Processor they are way ahead in performance
  • Ryan Smith - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Silver is an award for a great product. And it's the highest award we've given to a CPU in quite some time.

    Conversely, gold awards are very rarely given out. As the final arbiter on these matters, I would have given out a Gold if the Ryzen 3000 had consistently beaten the competition in both MT and ST workloads here.
  • RSAUser - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    And as I stated on another comment you had like this, completely dumb.

    The 3900X is cheaper, half the power budget, using a worse cooler, with the 9900K not having full mitigation patches and performance wins generally being erro rof margin, what exactly are you basing this on.
  • imaskar - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    You have just forgotten how much performance new generations brought before. What it was like to upgrade from P4 to Core2. Then from Core2Duo to Core i7. It was BOOST. Now it's just 15% here and there. That's why I agree that Silver is actually fair.
  • TEAMSWITCHER - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    I too think that the "Silver" award is the correct one.
  • madseven7 - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Well it shouldn't be Silver. Harder to get higher ipc gains than before. Write games and apps with multicore in mind instead of single threaded performance and maybe you'll see p4 to Core2 performance gains. 800lb gorilla with all those resources getting slapped around by a tiny fish. Should be GOLD!
  • RSAUser - Thursday, July 11, 2019 - link

    Change in circumstances, that was a decade ago. Performance difference per clock is still substantially different, should have been gold rated if modern Intel get silver.
  • Phynaz - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    what a cry baby.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now