Section by Gavin Bonshor

X570 Motherboards: PCIe 4.0 For Everybody

One of the biggest additions to AMD's AM4 socket is the introduction of the PCIe 4.0 interface. The new generation of X570 motherboards marks the first consumer motherboard chipset to feature PCIe 4.0 natively, which looks to offer users looking for even faster storage, and potentially better bandwidth for next-generation graphics cards over previous iterations of the current GPU architecture. We know that the Zen 2 processors have implemented the new TSMC 7nm manufacturing process with double the L3 cache compared with Zen 1. This new centrally focused IO chiplet is there regardless of the core count and uses the Infinity Fabric interconnect; the AMD X570 chipset uses four PCIe 4.0 lanes to uplink and downlink to the CPU IO die.

Looking at a direct comparison between AMD's AM4 X series chipsets, the X570 chipset adds PCIe 4.0 lanes over the previous X470 and X370's reliance on PCIe 3.0. A big plus point to the new X570 chipset is more support for USB 3.1 Gen2 with AMD allowing motherboard manufacturers to play with 12 flexible PCIe 4.0 lanes and implement features how they wish. This includes 8 x PCIe 4.0 lanes, with two blocks of PCIe 4.0 x4 to play with which vendors can add SATA, PCIe 4.0 x1 slots, and even support for 3 x PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 slots.

AMD X570, X470 and X370 Chipset Comparison
Feature X570 X470 X370
PCIe Interface (to peripherals) 4.0 2.0 2.0
Max PCH PCIe Lanes 24 24 24
USB 3.1 Gen2 8 2 2
Max USB 3.1 (Gen2/Gen1) 8/4 2/6 2/6
DDR4 Support 3200 2933 2667
Max SATA Ports 8 8 8
PCIe GPU Config x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x8*
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
x16
x8/x8
x8/x8/x4
Memory Channels (Dual) 2/2 2/2 2/2
Integrated 802.11ac WiFi MAC N N N
Chipset TDP 11W 4.8W 6.8W
Overclocking Support Y Y Y
XFR2/PB2 Support Y Y N

One of the biggest changes in the chipset is within its architecture. The X570 chipset is the first Ryzen chipset to be manufactured and designed in-house by AMD, with some helping ASMedia IP blocks, whereas previously with the X470 and X370 chipsets, ASMedia directly developed and produced it using a 55nm process. While going from X370 at 6.8 W TDP at maximum load, X470 was improved upon in terms of power consumption to a lower TDP of 4.8 W. For X570, this has increased massively to an 11 W TDP which causes most vendors to now require small active cooling of the new chip.

Another major change due to the increased power consumption of the X570 chipset when compared to X470 and X370 is the cooling required. All but one of the launched product stack features an actively cooled chipset heatsink which is needed due to the increased power draw when using PCIe 4.0 due to the more complex implementation requirements over PCIe 3.0. While it is expected AMD will work on improving the TDP on future generations when using PCIe 4.0, it's forced manufacturers to implement more premium and more effective ways of keeping componentry on X570 cooler.

This also stretches to the power delivery, as AMD announced that a 16-core desktop Ryzen 3950X processor is set to launch later on in the year, meaning motherboard manufacturers needed to implement the new power deliveries on the new X570 boards with requirements of the high-end chip in mind, with better heatsinks capable of keeping the 105 W TDP processors efficient.

Memory support has also been improved with a seemingly better IMC on the Ryzen 3000 line-up when compared against the Ryzen 2000 and 1000 series of processors. Some motherboard vendors are advertising speeds of up to DDR4-4400 which until X570, was unheard of. X570 also marks a jump up to DDR4-3200 up from DDR4-2933 on X470, and DDR4-2667 on X370. As we investigated in our Ryzen 7 Memory Scaling piece back in 2017, we found out that the Infinity Fabric Interconnect scales well with frequency, and it is something that we will be analyzing once we get the launch of X570 out of the way, and potentially allow motherboard vendors to work on their infant firmware for AMD's new 7nm silicon.

Memory Hierarchy Changes: Double L3, Faster Memory Benchmarking Setup: Windows 1903
Comments Locked

447 Comments

View All Comments

  • RSAUser - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    I still have an issue with posting TDP next to it if AMD and Intel are not using the same definition.

    The 3900X is pulling a max of 105W while the 9900K is pulling a minimum of 95W, it pulls close to 200W all core load.

    That difference is huge, and should be shown in the brackets next to the name.
  • NewCPUorder - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Intel owns this media, so they are very carefully publishing exactly what they want.
  • jordanclock - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    So, Intel wants them to publish numbers that are favorable for them, but are also okay with them explaining how they're bullshit? In an article that practically praises Ryzen 3000?

    Riiiiight.
  • Phynaz - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    AMD fanboys are idiots.
  • RSAUser - Thursday, July 11, 2019 - link

    Not really, the issue is more that everyone clued up in tech knows about it, so tech journalists don't bother commenting the fact, while the average person doesn't understand.
  • zealvix - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Will be good if there are retests performed in the near future with all latest vulnerability patched and same cooler used.
  • zealvix - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    "Meanwhile we should note that while the ZombieLoad exploit was announced earlier this year as well, the patches for that have not been released yet. We'll be looking at those later on once they hit."

    Other articles on the net shows both microcode update from Intel and OS patches from Microsoft have been released. Are they wrong ???
  • unclevagz - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    Amidst all the slapfighting between AMD and Intel, ARM have got to be pretty pleased with how their cores compare to these architectures (in spec2006) right now. A76 implemented in a mobile SoC with like 10 times worse memory subsystem and cache than the test setups here is at around ~Zen+ IPC and takes like 1/3 area/core on the same process as a Zen 2 core, and then A77 is coming around the corner with another expected IPC boost....
  • jjj - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    So the 3600 is the only one that's not poor value as AMD goes backwards in perf per dollar.
  • Tkan215 - Monday, July 8, 2019 - link

    The first time AMD zen 2 tie with i9900k in gaming and beat i9900k in almost every aspect of productivity! AMD will be great for streaming + gaming. How could this article didnt redo 1903? Why Intel system isnt patch for mitigation and security flaw. is that called ignorance or what that giving Intel some advantage in these area of benchmark. Please redo them and take time this time as AMD is still fixing most of its problem thank you!

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now