System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to the manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For X570 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1903 update as per our Ryzen 3000 CPU review.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our testbed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

The GIGABYTE X570 I Aorus Pro WIFI displays impressive power efficiency with the lowest long idle, idle, and full-load performance compared to other X570 models we have tested so far. 

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

In our POST time test, the GIGABYTE remains competitive as we managed to boot into Windows 10 in under 20 seconds; just a second slower than the GIGABYTE X470 Gaming 7 which we retested at the launch of Ryzen 3000. With non-critical controllers such as audio and networking disabled in the BIOS, we managed to achieve a POST time of just under 18 seconds.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

We test the DPC at the default settings straight out of the box, and the GIGABYTE does very well against the competition.

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • InTheMidstOfTheInBeforeCrowd - Friday, March 20, 2020 - link

    Hahaha, LOL... and respect, quite impressive. Makes me remember the old "Into the Shadows" demo from Triton (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSRGLapSx3w).
  • umano - Friday, March 20, 2020 - link

    I really hope next x670 boards will support 2 m2 pcie at full speed, thunderbolt and 10gbe, at least on dtx size. I know I am dreaming but this is what I would really buy
  • Dug - Friday, March 20, 2020 - link

    I wish you would test the parts of the motherboard that count, like networking, usb, sound, storage. Common Anantech. Get back to good reviews.

    It's getting old testing the same benchmarks that don't make any difference to users as they are all within a small percentage of each other.
  • qit - Saturday, March 21, 2020 - link

    "same power stages that the flagship GIGABYTE X570 Aorus Xtreme is using, albeit in a smaller package with fewer phases."

    Does a power delivery stage with significant less phases (6 vs 16) actually qualify as "the same"?

    Or is this more like a way of writing that wouldn't have appeared on anandtech years ago?
  • HardwareDufus - Saturday, March 28, 2020 - link

    This looks like it could be my next motherboard. Would like it if it had optical audio (SPDIF), but that's okay.
  • HardwareDufus - Saturday, March 28, 2020 - link

    Dual M.2 and Dual HDMI is a very thoughful combination! So many folks like two harddrives and use two monitors...
  • MetaCube - Tuesday, March 31, 2020 - link

    Dual M.2 are quite popular, but that would be great if MB manufacturers could fuck off with video outputs.
  • Qasar - Tuesday, March 31, 2020 - link

    only way for that to happen, is if amd/intel made 2 product lines, cpu and motherboard, from top to bottom.
  • watzupken - Monday, March 30, 2020 - link

    I was considering getting this board together to be used with the 4xxx series APU later in the year, while using it with a 3400G. However one thing that I don't like is the sharing of the heatsink between the NVME drive and chipset. I guess there is very limited space to separate these 2, but I don't think its an ideal solution. I read on Amazon reviews that the SSD temps get quite high as a result. And yeah, not too thrilled with the idea of active cooling on the motherboard since it can be another point of failure.
  • ForNein - Tuesday, April 7, 2020 - link

    I'm confused.

    There is a complaint on page two about the lack of an M2 thermal pad on the chipset heatsink and then in the final picture and description you mention the inclusion of an M2 thermal pad.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now