System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, POST time and latency. This can come down to the manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For Z490 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 1909 update.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single MSI GTX 1080 Gaming configuration with a wall meter connected to the power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our testbed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 1080)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 1080)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 1080)

Performance of the GIGABYTE in our power testing is very competitive, with decent long idle and idle results with not much variance between the other Z490 models on test.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

In our non UEFI POST time testing, the GIGABYTE performs middle of the road, with a default booting time of just under 15 seconds, with an even quicker time of 11 seconds with non-essential controllers disabled.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

We test DPC latency from out of the box with default settings, and the GIGABYTE puts in a respectable showing.

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • Deicidium369 - Thursday, January 7, 2021 - link

    They do CPU testing - did someone take them and sell them on Ebay?
  • Ian Cutress - Friday, January 8, 2021 - link

    We don't all work in a singular office. Ryan and I are several thousand miles away. We started the Intel 400-series testing with the 8 core and it's continued through.
  • anomalydesign - Friday, January 8, 2021 - link

    I'm surprised to see this review now with Z590 coming out in less than a week (and Gigabyte leaking their own Aorus lineup today, in fact).

    I guess it could still be a useful board to try and find on clearance for Rocket Lake (z590 doesn't seem to offer anything that you can't find on Z490, as far as I can tell), but testing a board of this level with a mid-tier CPU seems kind of crazy to me. I was wondering why the numbers looked so off until I realized I'd overlooked the 10700k in the testing notes. Very odd choice, for VRM analysis.
  • fogifds - Monday, January 11, 2021 - link

    Shouldn't I wait for Z590?
  • Tom Sunday - Friday, January 29, 2021 - link

    It does make sense to wait until the new Z590 boards hit the deck. Making sure that there are extra worth while boxes to be checked and seen and before making any $$$ jump. But we already know to get ready for sticker shock. Looked at the Z590 ASUS HERO VIII and this baby checks out at a cool $500. While BH has the Z490 Hero at around $379. If I only had the cash...but you know that drill.
  • rubi - Tuesday, January 12, 2021 - link

    wonder to see your stuff, i learned a lot of new things.
    https://odindownloads.net
  • NDRE28 - Monday, March 8, 2021 - link

    Yeah.
    Gigabyte is a very serious vendor.
    I own a Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Master, and it runs flawlessly.
    I also had other Gigabyte motherboards (non-Aorus) in the past and they all worked well.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now