Hot Test Results

Switching over to our hot testing results, as we see in the following tables, the Rosewill Quark PSUs generally offer very good power quality. The maximum ripple on the 12V lines is below 42 mV under full load, with the 750W version displaying weaker filtering than that of the more advanced platforms. The filtering of the 3.3V/5V voltage lines is very good as well, with our maximum reading being 34 mV when the 1200W version was heavily cross-loaded. Voltage regulation is good, at about 2% for the 850W to 1200W version and about 1.4% for the 750W version of the Quark.

Rosewill Quark 750W - Main Output
Load (Watts) 152.03 W 379.52 W 563.81 W 748.51 W
Load (Percent) 20.27% 50.6% 75.17% 99.8%
  Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts
3.3 V 1.98 3.38 4.94 3.36 7.41 3.33 9.88 3.32
5 V 1.98 5.16 4.94 5.13 7.41 5.09 9.88 5.05
12 V 11.13 12.14 27.83 12.13 41.75 12.01 55.67 11.96
Line Regulation
(20% to 100% load)
Voltage Ripple (mV)
20% Load 50% Load 75% Load 100% Load CL1
12V
CL2
3.3V + 5V
3.3V 1.6% 12 12 12 14 14 12
5V 2% 14 20 22 22 26 16
12V 1.5% 30 36 36 40 36 42

 

Rosewill Quark 850W - Main Output
Load (Watts) 172.7 W 429.61 W 635.84 W 846.17 W
Load (Percent) 20.32% 50.54% 74.8% 99.55%
  Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts
3.3 V 2.27 3.39 5.67 3.36 8.51 3.32 11.35 3.31
5 V 2 5.16 4.99 5.15 7.49 5.08 9.99 5.05
12 V 12.71 12.17 31.78 12.11 47.66 11.95 63.55 11.93
Line Regulation
(20% to 100% load)
Voltage Ripple (mV)
20% Load 50% Load 75% Load 100% Load CL1
12V
CL2
3.3V + 5V
3.3V 2.2% 10 12 18 22 20 24
5V 2.3% 10 16 18 26 22 26
12V 2% 16 20 26 36 36 30

 

Rosewill Quark 1000W - Main Output
Load (Watts) 203.05 W 503.92 W 750.6 W 996.17 W
Load (Percent) 20.31% 50.39% 75.06% 99.62%
  Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts
3.3 V 2.27 3.39 5.68 3.37 8.52 3.32 11.37 3.31
5 V 2.27 5.16 5.68 5.15 8.52 5.06 11.37 5.05
12 V 15.09 12.17 37.74 12.07 56.6 12 75.47 11.94
Line Regulation
(20% to 100% load)
Voltage Ripple (mV)
20% Load 50% Load 75% Load 100% Load CL1
12V
CL2
3.3V + 5V
3.3V 2.4% 12 16 20 22 20 26
5V 2.2% 14 18 20 24 20 28
12V 1.9% 20 22 28 34 36 36

 

Rosewill Quark 1200W - Main Output
Load (Watts) 243.25 W 607.74 W 902.88 W 1196.86 W
Load (Percent) 20.27% 50.65% 75.24% 99.74%
  Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts Amperes Volts
3.3 V 2.31 3.38 5.79 3.38 8.68 3.33 11.57 3.32
5 V 2.04 5.17 5.09 5.15 7.64 5.07 10.18 5.04
12 V 18.51 12.15 46.29 12.14 69.43 12.03 92.57 11.96
Line Regulation
(20% to 100% load)
Voltage Ripple (mV)
20% Load 50% Load 75% Load 100% Load CL1
12V
CL2
3.3V + 5V
3.3V 1.9% 14 18 24 26 24 30
5V 2.4% 16 18 26 30 26 34
12V 1.6% 20 26 34 38 40 32

Once again, we need to mention that these PSUs are rated at 40°C and we perform our testing at temperatures higher than 45°C - we could reduce the ambient temperature of our hotbox testing but we chose not to do so as the results would then not be comparable to those of our previous reviews.

High ambient temperatures have a significant impact on the electrical performance of the Quark PSUs. The average energy efficiency reduction is 2.5%, with the drop being very high when the units are heavily loaded, reaching 4.3% in the case of the fully loaded 750W version. Considering that these are units rated for operation at 40°C, running them at maximum capacity in higher temperatures are overload conditions for the Quark PSUs, which do well enough maintaining reasonable performance and power quality.

Efficiency

Power Losses

The internal temperatures per % capacity of the Quark PSUs inside the hotbox are nearly identical between the four units, with all four units reaching almost 100°C under full load. There are measurable thermal performance differences between the units, as the actual difference for a specific load is sometimes more than a few temperature degrees. This is especially true between the 750W version and the more powerful units, which are different platforms.

Intake & Exhaust Air Temperature

Heatsink Temperature

With such high internal temperatures, it was given that the speed of the fans would greatly increase, as the cooling system would strive to maintain operational temperatures within the units. For the 850W to 1200W versions, all three units display a linear increase of the fan's speed as the load increases, with the noise level reaching up to about 50 dB(A) at maximum load. The 1200W is slightly louder than the other two units, with a maximum of nearly 54 dB(A). What surprised us was the acoustics performance of the 750W version, which is greatly inferior to that of the significantly more powerful units. The rate at which the SPL increases significantly higher, with the 750W unit reaching a maximum of nearly 58 dB(A), making it much louder than the more powerful (and different platform) 850W version. As the speed of the fan was not much greater at this point, we can only surmise that the ball bearing fan of the 750W version has a significantly louder engine or that somehow a much stronger aerodynamic drag is being created by the fan or inside the unit. 

Sound Pressure Level
Cold Test Results Final Words & Conclusion
Comments Locked

34 Comments

View All Comments

  • Sivar - Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - link

    The Rosewill Silent Night is among the finest power supplies ever manufactured.
    Of course, it was manufactured by SuperFlower, the only company I'd put on par with Seasonic in terms of quality. You are probably referring to some other line of Rosewill.
    Fanless and runs my 6-core i7, 970GTX, and five hard drives without the slightest voltage drop.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - link

    Then not only are you missing out, you are also missing the point. Rosewill is not the one you should avoid, but rather, the OEM of the internals is the one to avoid. A lot of PSUs sold use one of several OEM models, and the ones used now are pretty good.
  • cosmotic - Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - link

    "Seasonic's infamous SS-1200XP3"

    Is there something wrong with the Seasonic? How is it infamous?
  • bigboxes - Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - link

    Infamous is not an indicator of something bad. It just means that it's a noted product. That could be for it's stellar performance or simply what it's known for.
  • bji - Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - link

    You're wrong.

    infamous: well known for some bad quality or deed.

    The author used the word incorrectly, but apparently a percentage of the readership won't know the difference so ... the downward spiral of the English language continues!
  • jbrizz - Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - link

    It was known for being badass, baby.
  • E.Fyll - Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - link

    Oh, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the Seasonic model. The original word was "influential", I did not really felt that it was suitable and I replaced it during my second pass. Apparently, I messed up while editing the text by either not deleting the word completely and the auto-correct function completing the new word as "infamous" or by just subconsciously getting influenced by the "in" prefix of the original word. Anyhow, of course the correct word is "famous".

    Thank you for your notice, it has been fixed.
  • Oxford Guy - Friday, January 22, 2016 - link

    Unlike their 1050 model which could be "heard from rooms away." Now that one was infamous.
  • Voldenuit - Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - link

    Who names a PSU 'Quark'?

    'Lepton' would make more sense; electrons have no quarks.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Wednesday, January 13, 2016 - link

    I have the 1000 watt model, and it is a beautiful PSU, simple, powerful, and silent. The only issue is the cables are rediculously stiff, even in my full atx case, it took quite a bit of force to manipulate them down so they wouldnt butt against the case. No other model has ever had such stiff cables in my experience.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now