Comments Locked

23 Comments

Back to Article

  • Souka - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    I just have to ask....what would the Fps be in Crysis? :)
  • jonup - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    FOTCL
  • jagoop - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    Never min Crysis - Minesweeper would totally rock on this box!
  • taltamir - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    you would think so, but you would be wrong.
    I have one and I have to tell you minesweeper lags, and it doesn't even have a cup holder!
  • jagoop - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    Never mind Crysis - Minesweeper would totally rock on this box!
  • Rajinder Gill - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    LOL, you folks are killing me..
  • TonyB - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    FU!!! My brother died trying to run Crysis
  • mfago - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    The chassis [PSU, MB, case] is actually about $1500 total, but are very hard to find to purchase separately.

    A decent system with 2x C2050, 2x E5620, and 12 GB DDR3 is about $9k from a reseller (e.g., Silicon Mechanics). $5k of that is for the Tesla cards... Note the Tesla are only 225 W, so the 1400 W PSU should be ok with four GPUs and two good CPUs (4x 225 W + 2x 130 W), as long as there are not many other high-power components.

    HOWEVER, I've been reading on the NVIDIA CUDA developer forums that there are all kinds of issues with systems such as these as they have two chipsets (one connected to each CPU) to provide the 4x PCIe 16x slots required.

    Has anyone actually used one of these?!

    Thanks,
    Matt
  • IanCutress - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    The Tesla C2050/2070s are rated at 247W, so 4 of those and 2 130W Xeons is approximately 1260W, but then add in all the RAM (up to 196GB), any extra PCI-E cards and hot swappable drives, and you're near the limit (depending whether the 1400W is the 93% value, or the actual value is 1400 * 0.93 = 1302W), but more than likely the PSU has some head room.

    I currently run a dual Xeon 5520 system with a basic CUDA card without trouble, but that system was purchased from Dell, and we didn't think about CUDA development when we bought it, hence the possibility of getting one of these. However, I still have severe issues regarding heat dissipation if I'm going to run them at load essentially 24/7.

    All the best,
    Ian
  • mfago - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    Actually, the PSU is only 1100 W on 120 v. To get 1400 W you need 240 V AC. So, quite limited.

    Another thing that worries me about that system is the six 5000 RPM fans. This thing is obviously meant for a server room, not an office!

    - Matt
  • GullLars - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    With the price tag on this thing, you could mount water cooling, drag the cables outside, and hook up a 1m² radiator with a suiting fan. Doing it your self would probably void warranty though :P
  • MySchizoBuddy - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    Are GPU based computers listed on the Top500 Supercomputer list?
  • MySchizoBuddy - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    we need editing feature
    I meant GPU based SuperComputers
  • mfago - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    The NCSA Lincoln cluster:

    http://www.ncsa.illinois.edu/UserInfo/Resources/Ha...

    was ranked in Top500 in 2006, but is not listed any longer.
  • IanCutress - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    The Tianhe-1 system at No. 5, which is a hybrid design with Intel Xeon processors and AMD GPUs. The TH-1 uses AMD GPUs as accelerators. Each node consists of two AMD 4870 GPUs attached to two Intel Xeon processors.

    Ian
  • zyren - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    These prices for the tesla cards are starting to get ridiculous. Last generations tesla cards were roughly $1300 for a 4gb model, which had the same amount of cores as the 280gtx. This years c2050, which is equivalent to the 470gtx except with 3gb of ram is $2500. The c0207, which si equivalent to the 480gtx with 6gb, is $4000. I was planning on building a 4 GPU workstation for around $10k but thats not happening. I might as well just buy 4 480gtx's and save myself a ton of money for the same performance. Sorry, but im not paying $14k for extra ram, especially when last years model was nowhere near that much.
  • mfago - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    Well, if you need double precision then NVIDIA forces you to buy the Tesla. For some applications the extra RAM is necessary too.
  • IanCutress - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    The GTX260 and above on the 200 line, and the GTX 470 and 480, also have double precision. The Teslas are just highly tested, ECC RAM, more RAM per GPU, and longer warranty, than their non-Tesla brethren. ECC errors due to cosmic radiation at most are one bit per gigabyte per hour, so depending on your algorithm and simulation (e.g. continuous function simulation vs random walk/brownian motion) depends on whether ECC or double precision is required.

    Ian
  • mfago - Wednesday, May 5, 2010 - link

    While the GTX 470 and 480 have double precision support, NVIDIA has decided to artificially limit the performance to 25% of the Tesla cards. Thus, while they support them, the performance is pitiful compared to both the Radeon 5870 and the Teslas.
  • EJ257 - Tuesday, June 1, 2010 - link

    I thought the higher prices are for the ECC RAM, more RAM than normal GTX470/480s and also the 3-yr warranty + 24/7/365 support. Otherwise the Tesla cards perform just like the GTX470/480 right?
  • strikeback03 - Wednesday, May 5, 2010 - link

    Didn't they approximately double the number of CUDA cores per GPU as well? So the pricing per "core" is similar.
  • mattmc61 - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    Great....isn't there ANYWHERE we can go to get away from advertising? Just because you posted your shopping site on a tech thread, I will never shop there.
  • playdoh - Tuesday, May 4, 2010 - link

    Ad bots can lick my nutz.......;)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now