Sony NSZ-GT1 Blu-Ray Player with Google TV Review
by Andrew Van Til on November 29, 2010 3:45 PM EST- Posted in
- Google TV
- Media Streamer
- Sony
- Media Player
- Blu-Ray
Video Quality
When evaluating HQV-HD scores, it is important to remember that while numbers are produced, the outcome is still somewhat subjective, so results should only be evaluated within the context that created them; in this case connected directly to a Panasonic TC-P58VT25. In this case the NSZ-GT1’s performance was consistent with similar devices with one notable exception not captured in the numbers; it is the first I’ve tested to pass all of the multi-cadence detection tests.
Power Consumption and Disc Load Delays
Compared to other Blu-ray players I’ve measured the Atom CE4100 equipped NSZ-GT1 consumes slightly more electricity in standby and idle states and falls squarely in the middle for disc playback; disc load times are also decent with an average time of 27.93 seconds. Player startup time from the low power standby mode is a little generous however because the clock stopped when the home screen was displayed, but the remote was very sluggish for several seconds after.
HDMI Input Audio
HDMI input on the NSZ-GT1 is limited to stereo PCM, so those with an AVR and more than two speakers will notice a loss in audio capability for most HD content sourced from the cable/satellite STB. I was interested to see if it was possible to force AC-3 using AC3Filter with the HDMI input, so I connected it to my home theater PC. Unfortunately, while it was possible to connect to the device using AC-3 disguised as PCM, the audio stream would not pass through the device, so we are stuck with only two channels until Sony updates the player.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
20 Comments
View All Comments
vshah - Monday, November 29, 2010 - link
is it nsx-gt1, or nsz-gt1? it varies in the title/article.ganeshts - Monday, November 29, 2010 - link
Editorial mistake :) Fixed, thanks!piroroadkill - Monday, November 29, 2010 - link
I'm not entirely sure who this is aimed at: the setup process looked pretty long-winded for most people who sit infront of a TV, being spoonfed content while drooling. I mean, seriously, a question whether you want the thing to boot slowly or quickly? It should make the best guess for defaults in the majority of cases, and give you the option to fuck with it later: look at how the Windows installation process has been streamlined over the years.Then the tech savvy guys? They already have an htpc and are more than willing to play around to get it right, using xbmc or some such...
bji - Monday, November 29, 2010 - link
Sony consistently makes the worst remote controls of any major consumer electronics manufacturer. It's likey they don't employ even a single user interface person to help design these devices, they just either rely on out-of-touch engineers or dumb marketing people to design their remotes.The ultimate example was the Playstation 2 remote. It was a grid of buttons with the DVD controls (ffwd, play, rewind, etc) placed fairly randomly and with no tactile distinction whatsoever between the keys. So totally lame.
Ever since the Playstation 2 remote I've been paying attention to Sony's designs and every time I see a Sony remote I am reminded that they still have the suckiest remote designers.
nutmac - Monday, November 29, 2010 - link
I would love expand HQV 2.0 benchmark comparison against popular players, such as PS3.babgvant - Monday, November 29, 2010 - link
That's a great point; I've never seen a media centric review of the PS3. As hard as it gets pushed as the ultimate BD player, it would be really interesting to actually test that.Voldenuit - Tuesday, November 30, 2010 - link
Andrew,while I found your review well-written and informative, I can't help but feel that you were a little too lenient with it in your final thoughts.
A google device that has no universal search? Fail.
A media streamer that has no worthwhile codec and container support? Fail.
A remote that is unusable by anyone without an IT degree? Fail.
A consumer device that you have to press Ctrl-Alt-Del to reboot when it hangs? WTF?
At the $300 asking price with the level of functionality and robustness out-of-the-box, the NSZGT1 deserves to be publicly lambasted, if not downright ridiculed.
Even Apple's RDF wouldn't be able to disguise this Thanksgiving turkey.
Also, any chance AT will revisit the Boxee Box with the revised firmware?
ganeshts - Tuesday, November 30, 2010 - link
Andy will respond to your comments on his leniency towards the NSZ-GT1 :)We will take a look at Boxee Box again as soon as TrueHD bitstreaming is enabled or December 15th, whichever is earlier.
babgvant - Tuesday, November 30, 2010 - link
GTV is a CE device targeted at mainstream users, so the abysmal container support is forgivable; otherwise, those are all valid points. That said, I think the platform's potential outweighs the teething issues; so while the current implementation is clearly unfinished, and I worry that Google doesn't understand the difference b/w the TV and mobile user experience, it is still too early to get out the pitchforks and torches. Six months from now will be another story.IMO the current MSRP for this player is too high (Sony even dropped the price $100 a few days ago, so they must also recognize this); it's crazy that we can buy a better BD player (faster, quieter, more power efficient and has 3D) from Sony for $140 less. Between us, unless the apps platform gets exponentially better real soon I think they will need to knock another $100 off the top to be competitive in the mainstream. I could have made that clearer in the FT.
Aloonatic - Wednesday, December 1, 2010 - link
Grrr, lost my comment with FireFox crashing, so my reply in brief...Re: $300 - This is a BluRay player too, let's not forget.
Then the rest of my rambling comment was mostly a complaint about Sony controllers, when they will invest in people to sort out this problem? They haven't produced a good controller/remote since the original PS controller, and that was a less than subtle copy of the SNES controller (and they are just copying Nintendo again with Move) which was OK at the time, but now is very old and tired but still they persist with it with the PS3?!?! Sort it out Sony! It's not like you are a corner/cost cutting budget brand for Jebus' sake!